Siem de Moes vs Mats Egbring
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Siem de Moes leads in interceptions / 90 and pass accuracy %. Mats Egbring is stronger in clearances / 90 and press intensity / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Active Full-Back. Statistically, he stands out as active in the tackle (2.2 tackles/90), reads the game exceptionally (2.4 interceptions/90), meticulous in distribution (86% pass accuracy), wins the physical battle (58% duel success) and switches play with precision (5.4 long balls/90, 64% accuracy).
A Active Full-Back. Statistically, he stands out as an aggressive ball-winner (3.8 tackles/90), reads the game exceptionally (2.3 interceptions/90), wins the physical battle (57% duel success), wins the ball cleanly (2.0 successful tackles/90), uses long balls frequently (5.7/90), active off the ball (2.5 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions and top 10% tackler in the league.
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Siem de Moes | Mats Egbring | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — |
| Interceptions / 90 | 2.56 | 2.26 | Siem |
| Clearances / 90 | 1.92 | 2.79 | Mats |
| Press intensity / 90 | 1.07 | 2.47 | Mats |
| Pass accuracy % | 100.00 | 71.00 | Siem |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Siem de Moes or Mats Egbring?
Siem de Moes leads in interceptions / 90 and pass accuracy %. Mats Egbring is stronger in clearances / 90 and press intensity / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Siem de Moes has a market value of N/A, while Mats Egbring is valued at N/A.