Best Alternatives to Siem de Moes

Playing Style Analysis

A Active Full-Back. Statistically, he stands out as active in the tackle (2.2 tackles/90), reads the game exceptionally (2.4 interceptions/90), meticulous in distribution (86% pass accuracy), wins the physical battle (58% duel success) and switches play with precision (5.4 long balls/90, 64% accuracy). Note: this profile is based on 484 minutes of playing time this season. The three closest DNA matches to Siem de Moes:

• Niels van Berkel(97% match) — A Active Full-Back. Statistically, he stands out as a prolific assist provider (0.37 assists/90), an aggressive ball-winner (2.6 tackles/90), reads the game exceptionally (1.6 interceptions/90), wins the physical battle (64% duel success) and top 10% tackler in the league.
• Tim Köther(97% match) — A Active Full-Back. Statistically, he stands out as an aggressive ball-winner (3.8 tackles/90), wins the physical battle (59% duel success), wins the ball cleanly (2.5 successful tackles/90) and active off the ball (2.6 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.
• Bryan Van Hove(97% match) — A Active Full-Back. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.1 key passes/90), a reliable supplier (0.16 assists/90), an aggressive ball-winner (3.0 tackles/90), reads the game exceptionally (1.6 interceptions/90), wins the physical battle (63% duel success), draws fouls effectively (2.1/90) and active off the ball (2.7 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.

Similarity uses per-90 performance across playing-style dimensions. How Player DNA matching works →