RisingTransfers
AI DNA Similarity

Best Alternatives to Thomas van den Belt

Players most similar to Thomas van den Belt (Midfielder, €1.3M) — ranked by AI DNA similarity score across playing style, pressing intensity, and tactical fit.

Top 3 Alternatives to Thomas van den Belt

  1. 1.Jerdy Schouten86% DNA match·PSV€22.0M
  2. 2.Luciano Valente85% DNA match·Feyenoord€18.0M
  3. 3.Kees Smit84% DNA match·AZ€22.0M

Ranked by AI DNA similarity — 768 dimensions across playing style, pressing intensity, and tactical fit.

RT

Intelligence Verdict

Aerials WonTop 12%
???Bottom 13%

A Box-to-Box....

See Full Verdict + Share Card →

Playing Style Analysis

Box-to-Box

A Box-to-Box. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.4 key passes/90), a regular goalscorer (0.21 goals/90), active in the tackle (1.9 tackles/90), heavily involved in play (59 touches/90) and active off the ball (2.7 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions. The three most similar players to Thomas van den Belt by playing style are:

  • Jerdy Schouten(86% match)Schouten is the kind of midfielder who makes a team's possession game feel inevitable rather than effortful—a metronome who rarely wastes a touch and almost never wastes a pass. His 92.3% pass accuracy and 75.3 passes per 90 both sit in the Eredivisie's top five percent, meaning he isn't just accurate, he's relentlessly active with the ball. The 10.32 passes into the final third per 90 is the counterintuitive number here: for a player who reads as a deep-lying anchor, he's consistently threading the needle forward, ranking top ten in the league.
  • Luciano Valente(85% match)A Box-to-Box. Statistically, he stands out as an elite creator (1.7 key passes/90), a reliable supplier (0.22 assists/90), penetrates with forward passing (8.4 final-third passes/90), heavily involved in play (68 touches/90) and a high-intensity presser (press score 3.2/90), constantly disrupting opposition build-up.
  • Kees Smit(84% match)A Box-to-Box. Statistically, he stands out as an elite creator (1.6 key passes/90), meticulous in distribution (88% pass accuracy), heavily involved in play (67 touches/90) and active off the ball (2.5 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions. However, he loses possession under pressure (1.6 dispossessed/90).

Transfer Intelligence

Jerdy Schouten delivers 86% of the same playing style, at a 1660% premium over Thomas van den Belt, with 0.91 key passes per 90 at age 29.

Similarity is calculated using per-90 performance data across multiple playing style dimensions. How Player DNA matching works →

T
Comparison Base
Thomas van den Belt
MidfielderNetherlands€1.3M
Full profile →

Similar Players — Ranked by DNA Similarity

#1
J
Jerdy Schouten
PSV · Eredivisie
Netherlands29yContract 2030
KP/900.91
G/900.04
Metronome
Last 5: → Stable
vs Belt: €21M more expensive · 5y older
86% match
€22.0M
#2
L
Luciano Valente
Feyenoord · Eredivisie
Italy22yContract 2030
KP/901.68
G/900.07
Box-to-BoxCreative
Last 5: ↓ Dip
vs Belt: €17M more expensive · 2y younger
85% match
€18.0M
#3
K
Kees Smit
AZ · Eredivisie
Netherlands20yContract 2028
KP/901.56
G/900.13
Box-to-BoxCreative
Last 5: → Stable
vs Belt: €21M more expensive · 4y younger
84% match
€22.0M
#4
P
Peer Koopmeiners
AZ · Eredivisie
Netherlands26yContract 2028
KP/901.10
G/900.09
Ball-WinnerDefensive
Last 5: → Stable
85% match
€10.0M
#5
J
Joey Veerman
PSV · Eredivisie
Netherlands27yContract 2028
KP/903.64
G/900.31
CreatorCreative
Last 5: ↓ Dip
84% match
€27.0M
#6
K
Kodai Sano
Japan · Eredivisie
Japan22yContract 2028
KP/901.49
G/900.09
Box-to-Box
Last 5: → Stable
84% match
€6.0M
#7
R
Ramiz Zerrouki
FC Twente · Eredivisie
Algeria27y
KP/901.56
G/900.11
MetronomeCreative
Last 5: ↑ Hot
84% match
€7.2M
#8
L
Lewis Holtby
NAC Breda · Eredivisie
Germany35y
KP/901.75
G/900.05
Box-to-BoxCreative
Last 5: → Stable
84% match
€6.5M
#9
K
Kian Fitz-Jim
Ajax · Eredivisie
Netherlands22yContract 2027
KP/900.70
G/900.17
MetronomeDefensive
Last 5: → Stable
84% match
€3.5M
#10
Y
Youri Regeer
Ajax · Eredivisie
Netherlands22yContract 2029
KP/900.43
G/900.00
Ball-WinnerDefensive
Last 5: ↓ Dip
84% match
€5.0M
#11
S
Sem Steijn
Feyenoord · Eredivisie
Netherlands24yContract 2029
KP/902.65
G/900.58
CreatorCreative
83% match
€14.0M
#12
G
Guus Til
PSV · Eredivisie
Netherlands28yContract 2028
KP/901.78
G/900.54
CreatorCreative
Last 5: → Stable
82% match
€15.0M

Ask AI: Why are these players similar?

Our 768-dimension Player DNA model matches playing style, physical profile, pressing intensity, and tactical fit. Ask the AI to explain exactly what makes these players statistically similar to Thomas van den Belt.

Ask AI about Thomas van den Belt

Frequently Asked Questions

Who are the best alternatives to Thomas van den Belt?
The top alternatives to Thomas van den Belt based on AI DNA playing style analysis include: Jerdy Schouten, Luciano Valente, Kees Smit, Peer Koopmeiners, Joey Veerman. These players were matched using Rising Transfers' 768-dimension DNA model across playing style, pressing intensity, and tactical fit — not just position or market value.
Which players are similar to Thomas van den Belt in 2026?
Players with a similar profile to Thomas van den Belt in 2026 include Jerdy Schouten (€22.0M), Luciano Valente (€18.0M), Kees Smit (€22.0M). For a deeper DNA-level comparison including playing style, physical attributes, and tactical fit, ask Rising Transfers' AI directly.
What position does Thomas van den Belt play and who plays similarly?
Thomas van den Belt plays as a Midfielder. Players with a comparable positional profile include Jerdy Schouten (Netherlands, €22.0M); Luciano Valente (Italy, €18.0M); Kees Smit (Netherlands, €22.0M); Peer Koopmeiners (Netherlands, €10.0M).
How does Rising Transfers find similar players?
Rising Transfers uses a proprietary 768-dimension Player DNA model trained on 3.2 million match events. Each player is represented as a vector across 35+ per-90 metrics including pressing intensity, passing footprint, dribbling profile, and defensive contribution. Similarity is measured using cosine distance — the same technique used in state-of-the-art AI systems — making it the most precise player comparison tool available publicly.