⬡ AI DNA · Live season

Lens· 2024/2025 · Pro League · FULL

Best Alternatives to Michal Skoras

Left WingPoland26y€1.8MFull profile →

Complete ForwardSmall Sample

0.07G/90

0.25A/90

Based on 756 min · 2024/2025 · Pro League · FULL

Ranked by AI DNA similarity — playing style, pressing, and tactical fit. Below: the closest replacements with per-90 stats and form.

DNA matchPrioritizes Pro League & top-tier peers

Top 3 alternatives to Michal Skoras

Dominik Kother85% match
MSV Duisburg · Bundesliga
Christopher Antwi-Adjei83% match
Schalke 04 · Bundesliga
Benja Domínguez83% match
Bologna · Serie A · €12.0M

Ranked by RT Player DNA + league/value credibility. Scroll for full list, per-90 stats, and share cards.

Next: turn this shortlist into a card or a lineup.

Make Skoras's card →Build XI with shortlist →Share cards ↓

Intelligence Verdict

InterceptionsTop 2%

???Bottom 18%

“Michał Skóraś is a Complete Forward....”

See Full Verdict + Share Card →

Playing Style Analysis

Complete ForwardSmall Sample

Michał Skóraś is a Complete Forward. Versatile attacker combining goals, creativity and work rate. Statistically, he stands out as an elite creator (2.3 key passes/90), creates high-quality scoring opportunities (1.43 big chances/90) and draws fouls effectively (2.4/90). The three closest DNA matches to Michal Skoras:

Dominik Kother(85% match) — Dominik Kother is a Complete Forward. Versatile attacker combining goals, creativity and work rate.
Christopher Antwi-Adjei(83% match) — Christopher Antwi-Adjej is a Complete Forward. Versatile attacker combining goals, creativity and work rate.
Benja Domínguez(83% match) — A Forward. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.3 key passes/90), a prolific assist provider (0.50 assists/90) and draws fouls effectively (3.0/90).

Similarity uses per-90 performance across playing-style dimensions. How Player DNA matching works →

Make card →

Similar Players — Ranked by DNA Similarity

Dominik Kother

MSV Duisburg · Bundesliga

Germany26yContract 2027

G/900.25

A/900.00

Complete ForwardSmall Sample

vs Skoras: +0.18 G/90

85% match

N/A

Compare Skoras vs Kother →

Ask about replacements for Skoras

Same DNA shortlist as above — budget fit, who to avoid, or why the top match works.

Knows 56,883 players. Knows 3,481 clubs.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who are the best alternatives to Michal Skoras?▼

The top alternatives to Michal Skoras based on AI DNA playing style analysis include: Dominik Kother, Christopher Antwi-Adjei, Benja Domínguez, Min-su Kim, Jakub Kamiński. These players were matched using Rising Transfers' 768-dimension DNA model across playing style, pressing intensity, and tactical fit — not just position or market value.

Which players are similar to Michal Skoras in 2026?▼

Players with a similar profile to Michal Skoras in 2026 include Dominik Kother (N/A), Christopher Antwi-Adjei (N/A), Benja Domínguez (€12.0M). For a deeper DNA-level comparison including playing style, physical attributes, and tactical fit, ask Rising Transfers' AI directly.

What position does Michal Skoras play and who plays similarly?▼

Michal Skoras plays as a Attacker. Players with a comparable positional profile include Dominik Kother (Germany, N/A); Christopher Antwi-Adjei (Ghana, N/A); Benja Domínguez (Argentina, €12.0M); Min-su Kim (Spain, N/A).

How does Rising Transfers find similar players?▼

Rising Transfers uses a proprietary 768-dimension Player DNA model trained on 3.2 million match events. Each player is represented as a vector across 35+ per-90 metrics including pressing intensity, passing footprint, dribbling profile, and defensive contribution. Similarity is measured using cosine distance — the same technique used in state-of-the-art AI systems — making it the most precise player comparison tool available publicly.

← Back to Michal Skoras's profile·Browse all players

Top 3 alternatives to Michal Skoras

Intelligence Verdict

Playing Style Analysis

Similar Players — Ranked by DNA Similarity

Ask about replacements for Skoras

Frequently Asked Questions

Share the comparison