RisingTransfers
AI DNA Similarity

Best Alternatives to Joel Chima Fujita

Players most similar to Joel Chima Fujita (Midfielder, €8.0M) — ranked by AI DNA similarity score across playing style, pressing intensity, and tactical fit.

Top 3 Alternatives to Joel Chima Fujita

  1. 1.Kaishu Sano84% DNA match·Japan€25.0M
  2. 2.Ezechiel Banzuzi84% DNA match·RB Leipzig€18.0M
  3. 3.Hidemasa Morita84% DNA match·Sporting CP€9.0M

Ranked by AI DNA similarity — 768 dimensions across playing style, pressing intensity, and tactical fit.

RT

Intelligence Verdict

DribblesTop 2%
???Bottom 0%

A Box-to-Box....

See Full Verdict + Share Card →

Playing Style Analysis

Box-to-BoxDefensiveSmall Sample

A Box-to-Box. Statistically, he stands out as an aggressive ball-winner (2.6 tackles/90), heavily involved in play (55 touches/90) and active off the ball (3.0 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions. However, he loses possession under pressure (1.6 dispossessed/90). The three most similar players to Joel Chima Fujita by playing style are:

  • Kaishu Sano(84% match)A Box-to-Box. Statistically, he stands out as reads the game exceptionally (2.4 interceptions/90), wins the physical battle (64% duel success), heavily involved in play (56 touches/90) and a high-intensity presser (press score 3.6/90), constantly disrupting opposition build-up.
  • Ezechiel Banzuzi(84% match)A Ball-Winner. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.0 key passes/90), a reliable supplier (0.17 assists/90), an aggressive ball-winner (2.6 tackles/90), wins the physical battle (60% duel success), heavily involved in play (65 touches/90), strong in aerial duels (4.0 aerials won/90), a high-intensity presser (press score 3.2/90), constantly disrupting opposition build-up and top 10% tackler in the league. Note: this profile is based on 523 minutes of playing time this season.
  • Hidemasa Morita(84% match)A Metronome. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.1 key passes/90), a reliable supplier (0.21 assists/90), an aggressive ball-winner (2.5 tackles/90), meticulous in distribution (87% pass accuracy), penetrates with forward passing (10.2 final-third passes/90), central to possession (73 touches/90) and a high-intensity presser (press score 3.1/90), constantly disrupting opposition build-up.

Transfer Intelligence

Kaishu Sano delivers 84% of the same playing style, at a 212% premium over Joel Chima Fujita, with 0.79 key passes per 90 at age 25.

Similarity is calculated using per-90 performance data across multiple playing style dimensions. How Player DNA matching works →

J
Comparison Base
Joel Chima Fujita
MidfielderJapan€8.0M
Full profile →

Similar Players — Ranked by DNA Similarity

#1
K
Kaishu Sano
Japan · Bundesliga
Japan25yContract 2028
KP/900.79
G/900.00
Box-to-Box
Last 5: → Stable
vs Fujita: €17M more expensive
84% match
€25.0M
#2
E
Ezechiel Banzuzi
RB Leipzig · Bundesliga
Netherlands21yContract 2030
KP/901.47
G/900.00
Ball-WinnerDefensive
vs Fujita: €10M more expensive · 3y younger
84% match
€18.0M
#3
H
Hidemasa Morita
Sporting CP · Liga Portugal
Japan31yContract 2026
KP/901.02
G/900.05
MetronomeDefensive
Last 5: → Stable
vs Fujita: 7y older
84% match
€9.0M
#4
A
Ao Tanaka
Leeds United · Premier League
Japan27yContract 2028
KP/901.52
G/900.15
CreatorCreative
Last 5: → Stable
84% match
€10.0M
#5
R
Romano Schmid
Werder Bremen · Bundesliga
Austria26yContract 2025
KP/902.69
G/900.08
CreatorCreative
83% match
€17.0M
#6
I
Ibrahim Maza
Bayer 04 Leverkusen · Bundesliga
Algeria20yContract 2030
KP/901.49
G/900.00
Creator
Last 5: → Stable
84% match
€25.0M
#7
C
Christoph Baumgartner
RB Leipzig · Bundesliga
Austria26yContract 2028
KP/901.38
G/900.55
CreatorCreative
Last 5: ↓ Dip
83% match
€20.0M
#8
J
Johan Manzambi
SC Freiburg · Bundesliga
Switzerland20yContract 2030
KP/900.79
G/900.18
Ball-WinnerSmall Sample
Last 5: ↓ Dip
84% match
€30.0M
#9
F
Fabian Rieder
FC Augsburg · Bundesliga
Switzerland24yContract 2030
KP/901.14
G/900.13
CreatorSmall Sample
Last 5: → Stable
84% match
€8.0M
#10
L
Leon Avdullahu
TSG Hoffenheim · Bundesliga
Switzerland22yContract 2029
KP/901.02
G/900.00
MetronomeSmall Sample
Last 5: ↑ Hot
83% match
€17.0M
#11
D
Daichi Kamada
Crystal Palace · Premier League
Japan29yContract 2026
KP/900.97
G/900.00
CreatorDefensive
Last 5: → Stable
84% match
€12.0M
#12
N
Niklas Hauptmann
Dynamo Dresden · Bundesliga
Germany29yContract 2028
KP/900.70
G/900.10
Balanced Midfielder
Last 5: ↑ Hot
84% match
€3.4M

Ask AI: Why are these players similar?

Our 768-dimension Player DNA model matches playing style, physical profile, pressing intensity, and tactical fit. Ask the AI to explain exactly what makes these players statistically similar to Joel Chima Fujita.

Ask AI about Joel Chima Fujita

Frequently Asked Questions

Who are the best alternatives to Joel Chima Fujita?
The top alternatives to Joel Chima Fujita based on AI DNA playing style analysis include: Kaishu Sano, Ezechiel Banzuzi, Hidemasa Morita, Ao Tanaka, Romano Schmid. These players were matched using Rising Transfers' 768-dimension DNA model across playing style, pressing intensity, and tactical fit — not just position or market value.
Which players are similar to Joel Chima Fujita in 2026?
Players with a similar profile to Joel Chima Fujita in 2026 include Kaishu Sano (€25.0M), Ezechiel Banzuzi (€18.0M), Hidemasa Morita (€9.0M). For a deeper DNA-level comparison including playing style, physical attributes, and tactical fit, ask Rising Transfers' AI directly.
What position does Joel Chima Fujita play and who plays similarly?
Joel Chima Fujita plays as a Midfielder. Players with a comparable positional profile include Kaishu Sano (Japan, €25.0M); Ezechiel Banzuzi (Netherlands, €18.0M); Hidemasa Morita (Japan, €9.0M); Ao Tanaka (Japan, €10.0M).
How does Rising Transfers find similar players?
Rising Transfers uses a proprietary 768-dimension Player DNA model trained on 3.2 million match events. Each player is represented as a vector across 35+ per-90 metrics including pressing intensity, passing footprint, dribbling profile, and defensive contribution. Similarity is measured using cosine distance — the same technique used in state-of-the-art AI systems — making it the most precise player comparison tool available publicly.