RisingTransfers
AI DNA Similarity

Best Alternatives to Ismail Jakobs

Players most similar to Ismail Jakobs (Defender, €6.0M) — ranked by AI DNA similarity score across playing style, pressing intensity, and tactical fit.

Top 3 Alternatives to Ismail Jakobs

  1. 1.Mert Müldür85% DNA match·Fenerbahçe€5.0M
  2. 2.Ferdi Kadıoğlu84% DNA match·Brighton & Hove Albion€28.0M
  3. 3.David Jurásek85% DNA match·Slavia Praha€3.0M

Ranked by AI DNA similarity — 768 dimensions across playing style, pressing intensity, and tactical fit.

RT

Intelligence Verdict

Chances MissedTop 0%
???Bottom 0%

Jakobs is the kind of left-sided defender who wins the ball like a midfielder and then reminds you...

See Full Verdict + Share Card →

Playing Style Analysis

Jakobs is the kind of left-sided defender who wins the ball like a midfielder and then reminds you, painfully, that he's not one. His duel win rate sits in the top 10% of the Super Lig—a genuinely elite number that masks a more complicated truth: he's winning ground battles at a premium rate while losing aerial contests below the league average, meaning his positioning invites exactly the type of challenge he handles worst. The counterintuitive read here is that his pass accuracy of 70.8% isn't laziness—it's aggression. The three most similar players to Ismail Jakobs by playing style are:

  • Mert Müldür(85% match)Müldür occupies a fascinating tactical grey zone—a defender who consistently threatens the opposition goal more than he's troubled by his own. His tackles won rate sits in the top 5% of Super Lig defenders, meaning he's not just positioning well; he's actively winning the ball back at an elite frequency for this league. Pair that with top-20% key passes and shots per 90, and you have someone functioning more like an advanced wing-back than a conventional fullback.
  • Ferdi Kadıoğlu(84% match)A Defender. Statistically, he stands out as meticulous in distribution (85% pass accuracy) and active off the ball (2.1 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.
  • David Jurásek(85% match)Jurásek is a specialist outlet trapped in a generalist’s role, operating as a low-volume, high-impact ball-progressor who defies the typical "stay-at-home" Turkish league defensive mold. While his raw passing volume sits in the bottom half of the league, he possesses a surgical eye for the final ball, ranking in the elite top 10% for key passes and dribbles per 90. The counterintuitive reality here is that Jurásek isn't a builder; he is a finisher of sequences.

Transfer Intelligence

Mert Müldür delivers 85% of the same playing style, at 17% lower cost (€5.0M vs €6.0M), with 2.98 tackles won per 90 at age 27.

Similarity is calculated using per-90 performance data across multiple playing style dimensions. How Player DNA matching works →

I
Comparison Base
Ismail Jakobs
DefenderSenegal€6.0M
Full profile →

Similar Players — Ranked by DNA Similarity

#1
M
Mert Müldür
Fenerbahçe · Super Lig
Turkey27yContract 2027
Tkl/902.98
KP/901.18
Physical StopperSmall Sample
Last 5: ↓ Dip
85% match
€5.0M
#2
F
Ferdi Kadıoğlu
Brighton & Hove Albion · Premier League
Turkey26yContract 2028
Tkl/901.71
KP/900.64
Last 5: ↓ Dip
vs Jakobs: €22M more expensive
84% match
€28.0M
#3
D
David Jurásek
Slavia Praha · Super Lig
Czech Republic25yContract 2029
Tkl/901.84
KP/901.27
Last 5: → Stable
85% match
€3.0M
#4
A
Abdülkerim Bardakcı
Galatasaray · Super Lig
Turkey31yContract 2027
Tkl/901.45
KP/900.56
Ball-Playing CBBall-Playing
Last 5: ↓ Dip
84% match
€6.5M
#5
S
Stefano Denswil
Kayserispor · Super Lig
Suriname33y
Tkl/900.96
KP/900.23
Ball-Playing CBAerial
Last 5: ↓ Dip
84% match
€6.0M
#6
R
Ricardo Esgaio
Fatih Karagümrük · Super Lig
Portugal32y
Tkl/902.71
KP/900.52
Last 5: ↑ Hot
84% match
€5.5M
#7
M
Mateusz Wieteska
Kocaelispor · Super Lig
Poland29y
Tkl/901.50
KP/900.10
Ball-Playing CBBall-Playing
83% match
€5.0M
#8
M
Modibo Sagnan
Rizespor · Super Lig
France27y
Tkl/902.29
KP/900.25
Reading DefenderAerial Defender
Last 5: ↑ Hot
84% match
€3.2M
#9
D
Dávid Hancko
Atlético Madrid · La Liga
Slovakia28yContract 2030
Tkl/902.05
KP/900.61
Ball-Playing CB
Last 5: ↓ Dip
83% match
€35.0M
#10
S
Sebastian Sebulonsen
FC Köln · Bundesliga
Norway26yContract 2028
Tkl/900.81
KP/900.46
AerialSmall Sample
84% match
€5.5M
#11
E
Eren Elmalı
Galatasaray · Super Lig
Turkey25yContract 2028
Tkl/901.95
KP/901.51
Active Full-Back
Last 5: ↑ Hot
84% match
€5.0M
#12
W
Wagner Pina
Trabzonspor · Super Lig
Portugal23yContract 2029
Tkl/902.10
KP/901.19
Active Full-Back
Last 5: → Stable
84% match
€8.0M

Ask AI: Why are these players similar?

Our 768-dimension Player DNA model matches playing style, physical profile, pressing intensity, and tactical fit. Ask the AI to explain exactly what makes these players statistically similar to Ismail Jakobs.

Ask AI about Ismail Jakobs

Frequently Asked Questions

Who are the best alternatives to Ismail Jakobs?
The top alternatives to Ismail Jakobs based on AI DNA playing style analysis include: Mert Müldür, Ferdi Kadıoğlu, David Jurásek, Abdülkerim Bardakcı, Stefano Denswil. These players were matched using Rising Transfers' 768-dimension DNA model across playing style, pressing intensity, and tactical fit — not just position or market value.
Which players are similar to Ismail Jakobs in 2026?
Players with a similar profile to Ismail Jakobs in 2026 include Mert Müldür (€5.0M), Ferdi Kadıoğlu (€28.0M), David Jurásek (€3.0M). For a deeper DNA-level comparison including playing style, physical attributes, and tactical fit, ask Rising Transfers' AI directly.
What position does Ismail Jakobs play and who plays similarly?
Ismail Jakobs plays as a Defender. Players with a comparable positional profile include Mert Müldür (Turkey, €5.0M); Ferdi Kadıoğlu (Turkey, €28.0M); David Jurásek (Czech Republic, €3.0M); Abdülkerim Bardakcı (Turkey, €6.5M).
How does Rising Transfers find similar players?
Rising Transfers uses a proprietary 768-dimension Player DNA model trained on 3.2 million match events. Each player is represented as a vector across 35+ per-90 metrics including pressing intensity, passing footprint, dribbling profile, and defensive contribution. Similarity is measured using cosine distance — the same technique used in state-of-the-art AI systems — making it the most precise player comparison tool available publicly.