RisingTransfers
AI DNA Similarity

Best Alternatives to In-beom Hwang

Players most similar to In-beom Hwang (Midfielder, €8.0M) — ranked by AI DNA similarity score across playing style, pressing intensity, and tactical fit.

Top 3 Alternatives to In-beom Hwang

  1. 1.Joey Veerman84% DNA match·PSV€27.0M
  2. 2.Ui-jo Hwang85% DNA match·Alanyaspor€4.0M
  3. 3.Lewis Holtby84% DNA match·NAC Breda€6.5M

Ranked by AI DNA similarity — 768 dimensions across playing style, pressing intensity, and tactical fit.

RT

Intelligence Verdict

Key PassesTop 8%

A Box-to-Box....

See Full Verdict + Share Card →

Playing Style Analysis

Box-to-BoxCreative

A Box-to-Box. Statistically, he stands out as comfortable with both feet, an elite creator (2.2 key passes/90), a prolific assist provider (0.27 assists/90), wins the physical battle (57% duel success), creates high-quality scoring opportunities (0.54 big chances/90), heavily involved in play (67 touches/90), active off the ball (2.8 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions and top 20% creator in the league. The three most similar players to In-beom Hwang by playing style are:

  • Joey Veerman(84% match)A Creator. Statistically, he stands out as an elite creator (3.6 key passes/90), a regular goalscorer (0.31 goals/90), a prolific assist provider (0.54 assists/90), active in the tackle (2.2 tackles/90), meticulous in distribution (86% pass accuracy), wins the physical battle (56% duel success), heavily involved in possession (74 passes/90), creates high-quality scoring opportunities (0.96 big chances/90), penetrates with forward passing (13.7 final-third passes/90), central to possession (95 touches/90), uses long balls frequently (8.2/90), active off the ball (2.7 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions and top 10% creator in the league.
  • Ui-jo Hwang(85% match)A Creator. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.0 key passes/90) and a reliable supplier (0.22 assists/90).
  • Lewis Holtby(84% match)Holtby is the kind of midfielder who quietly tilts games through distribution and dirty work rather than highlights—a profile that rarely gets the credit it deserves. Operating in the Eredivisie, his key passes and assists both rank in the top 20%, marking him as a genuine creative conduit for a B-tier side. His tackles won figure sits equally high, which is where the counterintuitive story lives: this isn't a soft playmaker hiding from contact, but someone who wins the ball and then uses it well.

Transfer Intelligence

Joey Veerman delivers 84% of the same playing style, at a 237% premium over In-beom Hwang, with 3.64 key passes per 90 at age 27.

Similarity is calculated using per-90 performance data across multiple playing style dimensions. How Player DNA matching works →

I
Comparison Base
In-beom Hwang
MidfielderSouth Korea€8.0M
Full profile →

Similar Players — Ranked by DNA Similarity

#1
J
Joey Veerman
PSV · Eredivisie
Netherlands27yContract 2028
KP/903.64
G/900.31
CreatorCreative
Last 5: ↓ Dip
vs Hwang: €19M more expensive · 2y younger
84% match
€27.0M
#2
U
Ui-jo Hwang
Alanyaspor · Super Lig
South Korea33yContract 2027
KP/901.01
G/900.15
Creator
Last 5: ↓ Dip
vs Hwang: 4y older
85% match
€4.0M
#3
L
Lewis Holtby
NAC Breda · Eredivisie
Germany35y
KP/901.75
G/900.05
Box-to-BoxCreative
Last 5: → Stable
vs Hwang: 6y older
84% match
€6.5M
#4
R
Ramiz Zerrouki
FC Twente · Eredivisie
Algeria27y
KP/901.56
G/900.11
MetronomeCreative
Last 5: ↑ Hot
83% match
€7.2M
#5
S
Sven Mijnans
AZ · Eredivisie
Netherlands26yContract 2028
KP/902.03
G/900.40
CreatorCreative
Last 5: ↓ Dip
84% match
€14.0M
#6
P
Peer Koopmeiners
AZ · Eredivisie
Netherlands26yContract 2028
KP/901.10
G/900.09
Ball-WinnerDefensive
Last 5: → Stable
84% match
€10.0M
#7
L
Luciano Valente
Feyenoord · Eredivisie
Italy22yContract 2030
KP/901.68
G/900.07
Box-to-BoxCreative
Last 5: ↓ Dip
83% match
€18.0M
#8
R
Roberto Olabe
UD Ibiza · Liga Portugal
Spain30y
KP/900.82
G/900.00
Box-to-Box
83% match
€3.0M
#9
K
Kees Smit
AZ · Eredivisie
Netherlands20yContract 2028
KP/901.56
G/900.13
Box-to-BoxCreative
Last 5: → Stable
83% match
€22.0M
#10
O
Oussama Targhalline
Feyenoord · Eredivisie
Morocco23yContract 2028
KP/900.94
G/900.10
Ball-WinnerDefensive
Last 5: ↑ Hot
82% match
€8.0M
#11
J
Jerdy Schouten
PSV · Eredivisie
Netherlands29yContract 2030
KP/900.91
G/900.04
Metronome
Last 5: → Stable
82% match
€22.0M
#12
A
Ayoni Santos
Sparta Rotterdam · Eredivisie
Netherlands20yContract 2030
KP/901.03
G/900.00
CreatorDefensive
Last 5: ↓ Dip
83% match
€40.0M

Ask AI: Why are these players similar?

Our 768-dimension Player DNA model matches playing style, physical profile, pressing intensity, and tactical fit. Ask the AI to explain exactly what makes these players statistically similar to In-beom Hwang.

Ask AI about In-beom Hwang

Frequently Asked Questions

Who are the best alternatives to In-beom Hwang?
The top alternatives to In-beom Hwang based on AI DNA playing style analysis include: Joey Veerman, Ui-jo Hwang, Lewis Holtby, Ramiz Zerrouki, Sven Mijnans. These players were matched using Rising Transfers' 768-dimension DNA model across playing style, pressing intensity, and tactical fit — not just position or market value.
Which players are similar to In-beom Hwang in 2026?
Players with a similar profile to In-beom Hwang in 2026 include Joey Veerman (€27.0M), Ui-jo Hwang (€4.0M), Lewis Holtby (€6.5M). For a deeper DNA-level comparison including playing style, physical attributes, and tactical fit, ask Rising Transfers' AI directly.
What position does In-beom Hwang play and who plays similarly?
In-beom Hwang plays as a Midfielder. Players with a comparable positional profile include Joey Veerman (Netherlands, €27.0M); Ui-jo Hwang (South Korea, €4.0M); Lewis Holtby (Germany, €6.5M); Ramiz Zerrouki (Algeria, €7.2M).
How does Rising Transfers find similar players?
Rising Transfers uses a proprietary 768-dimension Player DNA model trained on 3.2 million match events. Each player is represented as a vector across 35+ per-90 metrics including pressing intensity, passing footprint, dribbling profile, and defensive contribution. Similarity is measured using cosine distance — the same technique used in state-of-the-art AI systems — making it the most precise player comparison tool available publicly.