AI DNA Similarity
Best Alternatives to E. Søgaard
Players most similar to E. Søgaard (Defender, N/A) — ranked by AI DNA similarity score across playing style, pressing intensity, and tactical fit.
Top 3 Alternatives to E. Søgaard
- 1.Tim Oberdorf99% DNA match·Fortuna Düsseldorf
- 2.Marcus Kirchheiner98% DNA match·Aarhus Fremad
- 3.Ludvig Henriksen98% DNA match·B 93
Ranked by AI DNA similarity — 768 dimensions across playing style, pressing intensity, and tactical fit.
Playing Style Analysis
Ball-Playing CBBall-Playing
A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as active in the tackle (2.2 tackles/90), heavily involved in possession (61 passes/90), penetrates with forward passing (9.3 final-third passes/90), central to possession (77 touches/90), uses long balls frequently (10.2/90) and active off the ball (2.3 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions. The three most similar players to E. Søgaard by playing style are:
- Tim Oberdorf(99% match) — A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as active in the tackle (1.9 tackles/90), commanding in the air (5.2 clearances/90), wins the physical battle (61% duel success), penetrates with forward passing (8.3 final-third passes/90), central to possession (72 touches/90), uses long balls frequently (8.6/90) and active off the ball (2.2 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.
- Marcus Kirchheiner(98% match) — A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as active in the tackle (2.1 tackles/90), commanding in the air (4.6 clearances/90), wins the physical battle (61% duel success), penetrates with forward passing (11.8 final-third passes/90), central to possession (78 touches/90), uses long balls frequently (9.7/90) and active off the ball (2.7 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.
- Ludvig Henriksen(98% match) — A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as meticulous in distribution (85% pass accuracy), wins the physical battle (55% duel success), penetrates with forward passing (9.1 final-third passes/90), central to possession (80 touches/90), uses long balls frequently (5.9/90) and active off the ball (2.1 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.
Similarity is calculated using per-90 performance data across multiple playing style dimensions. How Player DNA matching works →
Similar Players — Ranked by DNA Similarity
#1
T
Tim Oberdorf
Fortuna Düsseldorf · Bundesliga
Germany29yContract 2026
Tkl/901.73
KP/900.49
Ball-Playing CBAerial
Last 5: → Stable99% match
N/A
#2
M
Marcus Kirchheiner
Aarhus Fremad · Superliga
Denmark29y
Tkl/902.00
KP/900.89
Ball-Playing CBBall-Playing
Last 5: ↑ Hot98% match
N/A
#3
L
Ludvig Henriksen
B 93 · Superliga
Denmark24y
Tkl/901.71
KP/900.43
Ball-Playing CBBall-Playing
Last 5: → Stablevs Søgaard: 5y younger
98% match
N/A
#4
C
Calvin Brackelmann
Paderborn · Bundesliga
Germany26yContract 2026
Tkl/903.38
KP/900.38
Ball-Playing CBAerial
Last 5: → Stable98% match
N/A
#5
F
F. Dietz
Hobro · Superliga
Denmark22y
Tkl/902.00
KP/901.00
Ball-Playing CBBall-Playing
Last 5: → Stable98% match
N/A
#6
D
Daníel Leó Grétarsson
Sønderjyske Fodbold · Superliga
Iceland30yContract 2027
Tkl/902.61
KP/901.10
Ball-Playing CBAerial
Last 5: → Stable98% match
N/A
#7
L
Luca Sirch
Kaiserslautern · Bundesliga
Germany26yContract 2026
Tkl/901.47
KP/900.74
Ball-Playing CB
Last 5: ↑ Hot98% match
N/A
#8
D
Diego Murillo
Málaga · La Liga
Spain25yContract 2029
Tkl/901.65
KP/900.24
Ball-Playing CBBall-Playing
Last 5: → Stable98% match
N/A
#9
E
Elison Makolli
Aalborg BK · Superliga
Sweden21y
Tkl/901.75
KP/900.12
Ball-Playing CBBall-Playing
Last 5: ↓ Dip98% match
N/A
#10
N
Noah Markmann
Nordsjælland · Superliga
Denmark19yContract 2027
Tkl/902.48
KP/900.23
Ball-Playing CBBall-Playing
Last 5: ↓ Dip98% match
N/A
#11
X
Xander Lambrix
TOP Oss · Eredivisie
Belgium26yContract 2025
Tkl/900.89
KP/900.56
Ball-Playing CBAerial
Last 5: → Stable98% match
N/A
#12
N
Nicolai Clausen
Hvidovre · Superliga
Denmark30y
Tkl/901.61
KP/901.25
Ball-Playing CBAerial
Last 5: → Stable98% match
N/A
⬡
Ask AI: Why are these players similar?
Our 768-dimension Player DNA model matches playing style, physical profile, pressing intensity, and tactical fit. Ask the AI to explain exactly what makes these players statistically similar to E. Søgaard.
Ask AI about E. Søgaard →Frequently Asked Questions
Who are the best alternatives to E. Søgaard?▼
The top alternatives to E. Søgaard based on AI DNA playing style analysis include: Tim Oberdorf, Marcus Kirchheiner, Ludvig Henriksen, Calvin Brackelmann, F. Dietz. These players were matched using Rising Transfers' 768-dimension DNA model across playing style, pressing intensity, and tactical fit — not just position or market value.
Which players are similar to E. Søgaard in 2026?▼
Players with a similar profile to E. Søgaard in 2026 include Tim Oberdorf (N/A), Marcus Kirchheiner (N/A), Ludvig Henriksen (N/A). For a deeper DNA-level comparison including playing style, physical attributes, and tactical fit, ask Rising Transfers' AI directly.
What position does E. Søgaard play and who plays similarly?▼
E. Søgaard plays as a Defender. Players with a comparable positional profile include Tim Oberdorf (Germany, N/A); Marcus Kirchheiner (Denmark, N/A); Ludvig Henriksen (Denmark, N/A); Calvin Brackelmann (Germany, N/A).
How does Rising Transfers find similar players?▼
Rising Transfers uses a proprietary 768-dimension Player DNA model trained on 3.2 million match events. Each player is represented as a vector across 35+ per-90 metrics including pressing intensity, passing footprint, dribbling profile, and defensive contribution. Similarity is measured using cosine distance — the same technique used in state-of-the-art AI systems — making it the most precise player comparison tool available publicly.