Best Alternatives to E. Søgaard

Playing Style Analysis

A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as active in the tackle (2.1 tackles/90), heavily involved in possession (60 passes/90), penetrates with forward passing (9.1 final-third passes/90), central to possession (76 touches/90), uses long balls frequently (9.8/90) and active off the ball (2.3 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions. The three closest DNA matches to E. Søgaard:

• Marcus Kirchheiner(98% match) — A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.0 key passes/90), active in the tackle (2.0 tackles/90), commanding in the air (4.7 clearances/90), wins the physical battle (61% duel success), penetrates with forward passing (11.9 final-third passes/90), central to possession (77 touches/90), uses long balls frequently (10.0/90) and active off the ball (2.6 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.
• Ludvig Henriksen(98% match) — A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as penetrates with forward passing (8.9 final-third passes/90), central to possession (78 touches/90), uses long balls frequently (5.8/90) and active off the ball (2.1 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.
• F. Dietz(98% match) — A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as active in the tackle (2.3 tackles/90), commanding in the air (4.2 clearances/90), reads the game exceptionally (1.8 interceptions/90), wins the physical battle (60% duel success), heavily involved in possession (72 passes/90), penetrates with forward passing (10.9 final-third passes/90), central to possession (90 touches/90), uses long balls frequently (11.1/90), a high-intensity presser (press score 3.3/90), constantly disrupting opposition build-up and top 10% tackler in the league.

Similarity uses per-90 performance across playing-style dimensions. How Player DNA matching works →