AI DNA Similarity
Best Alternatives to Daniel Høegh
Players most similar to Daniel Høegh (Defender, €100K) — ranked by AI DNA similarity score across playing style, pressing intensity, and tactical fit.
Playing Style Analysis
A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as commanding in the air (6.5 clearances/90), meticulous in distribution (87% pass accuracy), wins the physical battle (69% duel success), heavily involved in possession (67 passes/90), central to possession (82 touches/90), dominant in the air (3.5 aerials won/90, 70%), uses long balls frequently (7.0/90) and active off the ball (2.1 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions. The three most similar players to Daniel Høegh by playing style are:
- Nemanja Nedić(100% match) — A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as commanding in the air (6.5 clearances/90), meticulous in distribution (88% pass accuracy), wins the physical battle (66% duel success), heavily involved in possession (61 passes/90), central to possession (78 touches/90), dominant in the air (3.6 aerials won/90, 74%), uses long balls frequently (5.4/90) and active off the ball (2.2 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.
- Joachim Andersen(100% match) — A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as commanding in the air (7.4 clearances/90), meticulous in distribution (86% pass accuracy), wins the physical battle (61% duel success), heavily involved in possession (73 passes/90), penetrates with forward passing (10.4 final-third passes/90), central to possession (88 touches/90), uses long balls frequently (11.7/90) and active off the ball (2.0 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.
- Joris Kramer(100% match) — A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as commanding in the air (7.0 clearances/90), meticulous in distribution (88% pass accuracy), wins the physical battle (57% duel success), heavily involved in possession (64 passes/90), central to possession (79 touches/90), uses long balls frequently (8.0/90) and active off the ball (2.1 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.
Similarity is calculated using per-90 performance data across multiple playing style dimensions. How Player DNA matching works →
Similar Players — Ranked by DNA Similarity
#1
N
Nemanja Nedić
Kolding IF · Superliga
Montenegro30y
Tkl/900.54
KP/900.36
Ball-Playing CBBall-Playing
Last 5: ↑ Hot100% match
N/A
#2
J
Joachim Andersen
Fulham · Premier League
Denmark29yContract 2029
Tkl/901.40
KP/900.23
Ball-Playing CBBall-Playing
Last 5: → Stable100% match
€25.0M
#3
J
Joris Kramer
Go Ahead Eagles · Eredivisie
Netherlands29yContract 2028
Tkl/900.83
KP/900.57
Ball-Playing CBBall-Playing
Last 5: ↑ Hot100% match
N/A
#4
L
Lewis Dunk
Brighton & Hove Albion · Premier League
England34yContract 2026
Tkl/901.16
KP/900.22
Ball-Playing CBBall-Playing
Last 5: → Stable100% match
€4.0M
#5
T
Tomislav Glumac
Ümraniyespor · Super Lig
Croatia34yContract 2026
Tkl/901.09
KP/900.27
Ball-Playing CBAerial
Last 5: → Stable99% match
N/A
#6
E
Eric Smith
St. Pauli · Bundesliga
Sweden29yContract 2025
Tkl/901.42
KP/900.62
Ball-Playing CBBall-Playing
Last 5: → Stable99% match
€5.0M
#7
B
Bruno Martins Indi
Sparta Rotterdam · Eredivisie
Netherlands34y
Tkl/900.64
KP/900.18
Ball-Playing CBAerial
Last 5: → Stable99% match
€7.7M
#8
C
Chidozie Awaziem
Nantes · Ligue 1
Nigeria29yContract 2028
Tkl/900.97
KP/900.44
Ball-Playing CBBall-Playing
Last 5: → Stable99% match
€3.0M
#9
J
José María Giménez
Atlético Madrid · La Liga
Uruguay31yContract 2028
Tkl/901.75
KP/900.08
Ball-Playing CBBall-Playing
Last 5: → Stable99% match
€14.0M
#10
M
Mateusz Wieteska
Kocaelispor · Super Lig
Poland29y
Tkl/901.50
KP/900.10
Ball-Playing CBBall-Playing
99% match
€5.0M
#11
M
Matthias Ginter
SC Freiburg · Bundesliga
Germany32yContract 2027
Tkl/900.68
KP/900.52
Ball-Playing CBBall-Playing
Last 5: ↓ Dip99% match
€6.0M
#12
T
Toni Leistner
Hertha BSC · Bundesliga
Germany35y
Tkl/900.60
KP/900.40
Ball-Playing CBAerial
99% match
N/A
⬡
Ask AI: Why are these players similar?
Our 768-dimension Player DNA model matches playing style, physical profile, pressing intensity, and tactical fit. Ask the AI to explain exactly what makes these players statistically similar to Daniel Høegh.
Ask AI about Daniel Høegh →Frequently Asked Questions
Who are the best alternatives to Daniel Høegh?▼
The top alternatives to Daniel Høegh based on AI DNA playing style analysis include: Nemanja Nedić, Joachim Andersen, Joris Kramer, Lewis Dunk, Tomislav Glumac. These players were matched using Rising Transfers' 768-dimension DNA model across playing style, pressing intensity, and tactical fit — not just position or market value.
Which players are similar to Daniel Høegh in 2026?▼
Players with a similar profile to Daniel Høegh in 2026 include Nemanja Nedić (N/A), Joachim Andersen (€25.0M), Joris Kramer (N/A). For a deeper DNA-level comparison including playing style, physical attributes, and tactical fit, ask Rising Transfers' AI directly.
What position does Daniel Høegh play and who plays similarly?▼
Daniel Høegh plays as a Defender. Players with a comparable positional profile include Nemanja Nedić (Montenegro, N/A); Joachim Andersen (Denmark, €25.0M); Joris Kramer (Netherlands, N/A); Lewis Dunk (England, €4.0M).
How does Rising Transfers find similar players?▼
Rising Transfers uses a proprietary 768-dimension Player DNA model trained on 3.2 million match events. Each player is represented as a vector across 35+ per-90 metrics including pressing intensity, passing footprint, dribbling profile, and defensive contribution. Similarity is measured using cosine distance — the same technique used in state-of-the-art AI systems — making it the most precise player comparison tool available publicly.