Best Alternatives to Cedric Hatenboer

Top 3 Alternatives to Cedric Hatenboer

1. 1.Stefano Russo99% DNA match·DSC Arminia Bielefeld
2. 2.Max Ejdum99% DNA match·Odense BK
3. 3.G. Larsen98% DNA match·HB Køge

Ranked by AI DNA similarity — 768 dimensions across playing style, pressing intensity, and tactical fit.

Playing Style Analysis

A Box-to-Box. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.2 key passes/90), a reliable supplier (0.24 assists/90), active in the tackle (2.0 tackles/90), penetrates with forward passing (8.0 final-third passes/90), heavily involved in play (61 touches/90), uses long balls frequently (6.5/90) and active off the ball (2.6 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions. The three most similar players to Cedric Hatenboer by playing style are:

• Stefano Russo(99% match) — A Box-to-Box. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.1 key passes/90), wins the physical battle (57% duel success), penetrates with forward passing (9.0 final-third passes/90), heavily involved in play (69 touches/90), uses long balls frequently (6.5/90) and active off the ball (2.6 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.
• Max Ejdum(99% match) — A Box-to-Box. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.1 key passes/90), a reliable supplier (0.23 assists/90), wins the physical battle (55% duel success), heavily involved in play (63 touches/90) and active off the ball (2.6 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.
• G. Larsen(98% match) — A Box-to-Box. Statistically, he stands out as an elite creator (1.6 key passes/90), a reliable supplier (0.16 assists/90), active in the tackle (2.1 tackles/90), heavily involved in play (53 touches/90), a high-intensity presser (press score 3.0/90), constantly disrupting opposition build-up and top 20% creator in the league.

Similarity is calculated using per-90 performance data across multiple playing style dimensions. How Player DNA matching works →