RisingTransfers
AI DNA Similarity

Best Alternatives to Amando Lapage

Players most similar to Amando Lapage (Defender, €500K) — ranked by AI DNA similarity score across playing style, pressing intensity, and tactical fit.

Top 3 Alternatives to Amando Lapage

  1. 1.Jean Hugonet100% DNA match·Magdeburg
  2. 2.Marcus Mathisen99% DNA match·Magdeburg
  3. 3.Andreas Heimer99% DNA match·B 93

Ranked by AI DNA similarity — 768 dimensions across playing style, pressing intensity, and tactical fit.

RT

Intelligence Verdict

Chances MissedTop 0%
???Bottom 11%

A Ball-Playing CB....

See Full Verdict + Share Card →

Playing Style Analysis

Ball-Playing CBBall-PlayingAerial

A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as commanding in the air (6.5 clearances/90), reads the game exceptionally (1.5 interceptions/90), meticulous in distribution (88% pass accuracy), wins the physical battle (55% duel success), heavily involved in possession (62 passes/90), penetrates with forward passing (8.0 final-third passes/90), central to possession (79 touches/90), uses long balls frequently (9.5/90) and active off the ball (2.3 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions. The three most similar players to Amando Lapage by playing style are:

  • Jean Hugonet(100% match)A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as active in the tackle (1.8 tackles/90), commanding in the air (8.2 clearances/90), meticulous in distribution (85% pass accuracy), wins the physical battle (66% duel success), heavily involved in possession (63 passes/90), penetrates with forward passing (8.6 final-third passes/90), central to possession (83 touches/90), dominant in the air (3.9 aerials won/90, 65%), uses long balls frequently (10.5/90) and active off the ball (2.4 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.
  • Marcus Mathisen(99% match)A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as active in the tackle (1.9 tackles/90), commanding in the air (6.6 clearances/90), reads the game exceptionally (1.8 interceptions/90), wins the physical battle (56% duel success), heavily involved in possession (65 passes/90), penetrates with forward passing (11.2 final-third passes/90), central to possession (82 touches/90), uses long balls frequently (12.7/90) and active off the ball (2.7 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.
  • Andreas Heimer(99% match)A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as commanding in the air (5.0 clearances/90), meticulous in distribution (85% pass accuracy), wins the physical battle (62% duel success), heavily involved in possession (76 passes/90), penetrates with forward passing (11.2 final-third passes/90), central to possession (91 touches/90), uses long balls frequently (8.1/90) and active off the ball (2.5 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.

Similarity is calculated using per-90 performance data across multiple playing style dimensions. How Player DNA matching works →

A
Comparison Base
Amando Lapage
DefenderBelgium€500K
Full profile →

Similar Players — Ranked by DNA Similarity

#1
J
Jean Hugonet
Magdeburg · Bundesliga
France26y
Tkl/902.00
KP/900.60
Ball-Playing CBBall-Playing
Last 5: ↑ Hot
vs Lapage: 5y older
100% match
N/A
#2
M
Marcus Mathisen
Magdeburg · Bundesliga
Denmark30y
Tkl/901.61
KP/900.58
Ball-Playing CBBall-Playing
Last 5: ↑ Hot
vs Lapage: 9y older
99% match
N/A
#3
A
Andreas Heimer
B 93 · Superliga
Denmark28y
Tkl/901.79
KP/900.36
Ball-Playing CBBall-Playing
Last 5: → Stable
vs Lapage: 7y older
99% match
N/A
#4
J
J. Witt
Hillerød · Superliga
Denmark33y
Tkl/900.88
KP/900.33
Ball-Playing CBBall-Playing
Last 5: → Stable
99% match
N/A
#5
D
Daniel Stenderup
Hvidovre · Superliga
Denmark36y
Tkl/901.83
KP/900.29
Ball-Playing CBAerial
Last 5: ↓ Dip
99% match
N/A
#6
R
Rick Meissen
Excelsior · Eredivisie
Netherlands24y
Tkl/901.03
KP/900.33
Ball-Playing CBAerial
Last 5: ↑ Hot
99% match
N/A
#7
B
Bjarne Pudel
Aalborg BK · Superliga
Germany25yContract 2028
Tkl/901.05
KP/900.35
Ball-Playing CBBall-Playing
99% match
N/A
#8
G
Gautier Lloris
Le Havre · Ligue 1
France30yContract 2026
Tkl/901.31
KP/900.00
Ball-Playing CBAerial
99% match
N/A
#9
N
Nemanja Nedić
Kolding IF · Superliga
Montenegro31y
Tkl/900.54
KP/900.36
Ball-Playing CBBall-Playing
Last 5: ↑ Hot
99% match
N/A
#10
M
Marcus Kirchheiner
Aarhus Fremad · Superliga
Denmark29y
Tkl/902.00
KP/900.89
Ball-Playing CBBall-Playing
Last 5: ↑ Hot
99% match
N/A
#11
M
Marvin Young
Sparta Rotterdam · Eredivisie
Netherlands20y
Tkl/902.22
KP/900.41
Ball-Playing CBAerial
Last 5: ↑ Hot
99% match
N/A
#12
J
Joris Kramer
Go Ahead Eagles · Eredivisie
Netherlands29yContract 2028
Tkl/900.80
KP/900.49
Ball-Playing CBBall-Playing
Last 5: → Stable
99% match
N/A

Ask AI: Why are these players similar?

Our 768-dimension Player DNA model matches playing style, physical profile, pressing intensity, and tactical fit. Ask the AI to explain exactly what makes these players statistically similar to Amando Lapage.

Ask AI about Amando Lapage

Frequently Asked Questions

Who are the best alternatives to Amando Lapage?
The top alternatives to Amando Lapage based on AI DNA playing style analysis include: Jean Hugonet, Marcus Mathisen, Andreas Heimer, J. Witt, Daniel Stenderup. These players were matched using Rising Transfers' 768-dimension DNA model across playing style, pressing intensity, and tactical fit — not just position or market value.
Which players are similar to Amando Lapage in 2026?
Players with a similar profile to Amando Lapage in 2026 include Jean Hugonet (N/A), Marcus Mathisen (N/A), Andreas Heimer (N/A). For a deeper DNA-level comparison including playing style, physical attributes, and tactical fit, ask Rising Transfers' AI directly.
What position does Amando Lapage play and who plays similarly?
Amando Lapage plays as a Defender. Players with a comparable positional profile include Jean Hugonet (France, N/A); Marcus Mathisen (Denmark, N/A); Andreas Heimer (Denmark, N/A); J. Witt (Denmark, N/A).
How does Rising Transfers find similar players?
Rising Transfers uses a proprietary 768-dimension Player DNA model trained on 3.2 million match events. Each player is represented as a vector across 35+ per-90 metrics including pressing intensity, passing footprint, dribbling profile, and defensive contribution. Similarity is measured using cosine distance — the same technique used in state-of-the-art AI systems — making it the most precise player comparison tool available publicly.