RisingTransfers
AI DNA Similarity

Best Alternatives to Andrew

Players most similar to Andrew (Goalkeeper, €7.0M) — ranked by AI DNA similarity score across playing style, pressing intensity, and tactical fit.

Top 3 Alternatives to Andrew

  1. 1.Jean Butez87% DNA match·Como€8.0M
  2. 2.Emil Audero87% DNA match·Cremonese€3.2M
  3. 3.Marco Carnesecchi86% DNA match·Atalanta€25.0M

Ranked by AI DNA similarity — 768 dimensions across playing style, pressing intensity, and tactical fit.

RT

Intelligence Verdict

Tackles WonTop 6%
???Bottom 0%

A Reliable Keeper....

See Full Verdict + Share Card →

Playing Style Analysis

Reliable Keeper

A Reliable Keeper. Statistically, he stands out as dominant in aerial duels (100% success) and keeps goals out effectively (0.72 conceded/90). The three most similar players to Andrew by playing style are:

  • Jean Butez(87% match)Butez has carved out a quietly elite identity in Serie A as a goalkeeper who builds play with the conviction of a midfielder and dominates his aerial zone with uncommon authority. His 84.9% pass accuracy and 36.5 passes per 90 both land in the top 10% of Serie A keepers, meaning he isn't just tidy in possession—he's genuinely driving his team's build-up from the back. The aerial win rate sitting in the top 5% is the counterintuitive headline: raw numbers suggest an average volume of aerial duels won, but his 50% success rate against elite Serie A attackers tells a different story about physical dominance under pressure.
  • Emil Audero(87% match)A Sweeper-Keeper. Statistically, he stands out as dominant in aerial duels (100% success) and reliable in goal (3.5 saves/90).
  • Marco Carnesecchi(86% match)Carnesecchi has quietly built one of Serie A's most complete goalkeeping profiles without ever dominating a single headline statistic—which is, paradoxically, exactly what makes him interesting. His 30.9 passes per 90 sits above the league average, and a 68.6% accuracy rate suggests he's attempting ambitious distribution rather than recycling safe laterals—his passes into the final third rank above average, meaning he's actively functioning as a build-up participant rather than a reset button. The duel win rate of 91.7% lands at league average, which sounds unremarkable until you consider Atalanta's high defensive line routinely exposes keepers to one-versus-one situations most Serie A goalkeepers simply never face.

Transfer Intelligence

Jean Butez delivers 87% of the same playing style, at a 14% premium over Andrew, and is 30 years old.

Similarity is calculated using per-90 performance data across multiple playing style dimensions. How Player DNA matching works →

A
Comparison Base
Andrew
GoalkeeperBrazil€7.0M
Full profile →

Similar Players — Ranked by DNA Similarity

Ask AI: Why are these players similar?

Our 768-dimension Player DNA model matches playing style, physical profile, pressing intensity, and tactical fit. Ask the AI to explain exactly what makes these players statistically similar to Andrew.

Ask AI about Andrew

Frequently Asked Questions

Who are the best alternatives to Andrew?
The top alternatives to Andrew based on AI DNA playing style analysis include: Jean Butez, Emil Audero, Marco Carnesecchi, Vanja Milinković-Savić , Ivan Provedel. These players were matched using Rising Transfers' 768-dimension DNA model across playing style, pressing intensity, and tactical fit — not just position or market value.
Which players are similar to Andrew in 2026?
Players with a similar profile to Andrew in 2026 include Jean Butez (€8.0M), Emil Audero (€3.2M), Marco Carnesecchi (€25.0M). For a deeper DNA-level comparison including playing style, physical attributes, and tactical fit, ask Rising Transfers' AI directly.
What position does Andrew play and who plays similarly?
Andrew plays as a Goalkeeper. Players with a comparable positional profile include Jean Butez (France, €8.0M); Emil Audero (Italy, €3.2M); Marco Carnesecchi (Italy, €25.0M); Vanja Milinković-Savić  (Serbia, €20.0M).
How does Rising Transfers find similar players?
Rising Transfers uses a proprietary 768-dimension Player DNA model trained on 3.2 million match events. Each player is represented as a vector across 35+ per-90 metrics including pressing intensity, passing footprint, dribbling profile, and defensive contribution. Similarity is measured using cosine distance — the same technique used in state-of-the-art AI systems — making it the most precise player comparison tool available publicly.