Vitinha vs Rodri — stats comparison PK
Club PK
Paris Saint Germain vs Manchester City

Pick below to start

PSG metronome vs City’s immovable No.6
Pick once · vote each round
Preview · read-only
Vitinha
Market value (€)
Rodri
Vitinha
Season goals
Rodri
Vitinha
Goals / 90
Rodri
Round 1 · Basics
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 2 · Recent form
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 3 · Per-90 comparison
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 4 · DNA & style
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 5 · Value fight
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Vitinha vs Rodri statistical comparison
THE CALL: Split 53–47 — the statistics disagree across dimensions; neither player dominates every round. Market value: Vitinha €110.0M vs Rodri €75.0M.
Round 1: Basics
Vitinha has the stronger profile on minutes, rating, and market cues.
- Age: Vitinha 26 · Rodri 29
- Market value (€): Vitinha €110.0M · Rodri €75.0M
- Appearances (season): Vitinha 29 · Rodri 21
- Minutes played: Vitinha 2120.00 · Rodri 1513.00
- Avg rating: Vitinha 7.51 · Rodri 7.30
Round 2: Recent form
Rodri carries sharper recent form — season and last-10 output tilt their way.
Last 10 matches
- Avg rating (last 10): Vitinha 7.10 · Rodri 7.52
- Apps (last 10): Vitinha 10 · Rodri 10
- Goals (last 10): Vitinha 0 · Rodri 1
- Assists (last 10): Vitinha 0 · Rodri 0
This season
- Season goals: Vitinha 1 · Rodri 1
- Season assists: Vitinha 7 · Rodri 0
- Season rating: Vitinha 7.51 · Rodri 7.30
- Season appearances: Vitinha 29.00 · Rodri 21.00
- Prev season goals: Vitinha 5.00 · Rodri 8.00
- Prev season assists: Vitinha 2.00 · Rodri 9.00
Round 3: Per-90 comparison
Vitinha has the sharper per-90 profile in their role; Rodri still answers in theirs.
- Goals / 90: Vitinha 0.04 · Rodri 0.06
- Assists / 90: Vitinha 0.30 · Rodri 0.00
- Shots / 90: Vitinha 1.44 · Rodri 1.01
- Key passes / 90: Vitinha 1.44 · Rodri 1.49
- Dribbles / 90: Vitinha 0.55 · Rodri 0.42
- Big chances / 90: Vitinha 0.39 · Rodri 0.14
- Passes / 90: Vitinha 116.45 · Rodri 96.25
- Final-third passes / 90: Vitinha 16.68 · Rodri 10.92
- Tackles won / 90: Vitinha 0.73 · Rodri 1.30
- Interceptions / 90: Vitinha 1.15 · Rodri 0.83
- Clearances / 90: Vitinha 0.93 · Rodri 2.44
- Aerials won / 90: Vitinha 0.34 · Rodri 3.03
- Ball recovery / 90: Vitinha 6.21 · Rodri 6.58
- Press intensity / 90: Vitinha 2.95 · Rodri 3.16
- Pass accuracy %: Vitinha 94.0 · Rodri 90.1
Round 4: DNA & style
Vitinha edges the DNA round on style percentiles and archetype tags.
- Assists · league rank: Vitinha Top 10% · Rodri Beats 0%
- Tackles · league rank: Vitinha Beats 8% · Rodri Top 29%
- Big chances · league rank: Vitinha Top 19% · Rodri Beats 38%
- Shots · league rank: Vitinha Top 32% · Rodri Beats 37%
- Interceptions · league rank: Vitinha Top 33% · Rodri Beats 42%
- Press · league rank: Vitinha Top 25% · Rodri Top 9%
- Goals · league rank: Vitinha Beats 38% · Rodri Beats 33%
- Ball recovery · league rank: Vitinha Top 13% · Rodri Top 8%
- Dribbles · league rank: Vitinha Beats 32% · Rodri Beats 29%
- Key passes · league rank: Vitinha Top 25% · Rodri Top 28%
Round 5: Value fight
Vitinha looks stronger on value — fee, trend, or goal efficiency.
- Current value (€): Vitinha €110.0M · Rodri €75.0M
- Peak value (€): Vitinha €110.0M · Rodri €75.0M
- Value trend %: Vitinha — · Rodri —
- € per season goal: Vitinha €110.0M · Rodri €75.0M
Comparison FAQ
- How do Vitinha and Rodri compare?
- THE CALL: Split 53–47 — the statistics disagree across dimensions; neither player dominates every round. Market value: Vitinha €110.0M vs Rodri €75.0M.
- What statistics are used in this PK?
- Five rounds: profile basics, recent form (last 10 matches and current season), role-aware per-90 metrics, vec_player_dna style tags, and market-value efficiency. Stats are normalised per 90 minutes where applicable.
- How does Rising Transfers calculate player comparisons?
- RT uses fact_player_stats_seasonal for seasonal and per-90 output, match_player_stats for recent form, vec_player_dna for style similarity, and integrated market-value history.