Club PK
Randers FC vs Brøndby IF
Pick below to start
Head-to-head player comparison · per-90 stats & DNA
Pick once · vote each round
Round 1 · Basics
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 2 · Recent form
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 3 · Per-90 comparison
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 4 · DNA & style
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 5 · Value fight
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
THE CALL: Split 52–48 — the statistics disagree across dimensions; neither player dominates every round.
Izzo has the stronger profile on minutes, rating, and market cues.
Pentz carries sharper recent form — season and last-10 output tilt their way.
Pentz has the sharper per-90 profile in their role; Izzo still answers in theirs.
Izzo edges the DNA round on style percentiles and archetype tags.
Pick
I'm backing Izzo
Preview · read-only
Izzo
Market value (€)
Pentz
Izzo
Season goals
Pentz
Izzo
Goals / 90
Pentz
Market value and efficiency metrics land in a draw band.
| 3.80 |
| 3.24 |
| Per-90 comparison | Passes / 90 | 30.60 | 33.51 |
| Per-90 comparison | Pass accuracy % | 68.3 | 77.5 |
| Per-90 comparison | Saves / 90 | 3.80 | 3.24 |
| DNA & style | Ball recovery · league rank | Top 17% | Beats 28% |
| DNA & style | clearances · league rank | Beats 39% | Beats 17% |
| DNA & style | Saves · league rank | Top 17% | Top 33% |
Per-90 and seasonal stats from RT data. Use the interactive PK above for all five rounds.
