Club PK
FC Utrecht vs AZ
Pick below to start
Head-to-head player comparison · per-90 stats & DNA
Pick once · vote each round
Round 1 · Basics
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 2 · Recent form
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 3 · Per-90 comparison
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 4 · DNA & style
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 5 · Value fight
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
THE CALL: Troy Parrott edges this comparison 42–58 on RT data — a tendency, not an absolute "better player" verdict. Market value: Noah Ohio €1.5M vs Troy Parrott €22.0M.
Parrott has the stronger profile on minutes, rating, and market cues.
Parrott carries sharper recent form — season and last-10 output tilt their way.
Parrott has the sharper per-90 profile in their role; Ohio still answers in theirs.
Pick
I'm backing Ohio
Preview · read-only
Ohio
Market value (€)
Parrott
Ohio
Season goals
Parrott
Ohio
Goals / 90
Parrott
Style vectors overlap — DNA tags do not crown a single winner this round.
Parrott looks stronger on value — fee, trend, or goal efficiency.
| Season rating |
| 7.41 |
| 7.16 |
| Per-90 comparison | Goals / 90 | 1.17 | 0.69 |
| Per-90 comparison | Assists / 90 | 0.00 | 0.16 |
| Per-90 comparison | Shots / 90 | 3.90 | 3.59 |
| DNA & style | Assists · league rank | Beats 0% | Top 42% |
| DNA & style | Big chances · league rank | Top 10% | Beats 45% |
| DNA & style | Key passes · league rank | Top 37% | Beats 29% |
Per-90 and seasonal stats from RT data. Use the interactive PK above for all five rounds.
