Club PK
CFR Cluj vs HB Køge
Pick below to start
Head-to-head player comparison · per-90 stats & DNA
Pick once · vote each round
Round 1 · Basics
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 2 · Recent form
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 3 · Per-90 comparison
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 4 · DNA & style
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 5 · Value fight
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
THE CALL: Split 53–47 — the statistics disagree across dimensions; neither player dominates every round.
Larsen has the stronger profile on minutes, rating, and market cues.
Larsen carries sharper recent form — season and last-10 output tilt their way.
Coco has the sharper per-90 profile in their role; Larsen still answers in theirs.
Coco edges the DNA round on style percentiles and archetype tags.
Pick
I'm backing Coco
Preview · read-only
Coco
Market value (€)
Larsen
Coco
Season goals
Larsen
Coco
Goals / 90
Larsen
Market value and efficiency metrics land in a draw band.
| 0 |
| 2 |
| Per-90 comparison | Passes / 90 | 66.89 | 39.27 |
| Per-90 comparison | Interceptions / 90 | 2.42 | 0.55 |
| Per-90 comparison | Clearances / 90 | 2.86 | 2.82 |
| DNA & style | Interceptions · league rank | Top 2% | Beats 12% |
| DNA & style | clearances · league rank | Beats 25% | Beats 17% |
| DNA & style | Press · league rank | Top 1% | Top 5% |
Per-90 and seasonal stats from RT data. Use the interactive PK above for all five rounds.
