Club PK
FC Groningen vs PEC Zwolle
Pick below to start
Head-to-head player comparison · per-90 stats & DNA
Pick once · vote each round
Round 1 · Basics
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 2 · Recent form
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 3 · Per-90 comparison
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 4 · DNA & style
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 5 · Value fight
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
THE CALL: Split 51–49 — the statistics disagree across dimensions; neither player dominates every round.
Peersman has the stronger profile on minutes, rating, and market cues.
Floranus carries sharper recent form — season and last-10 output tilt their way.
Per-90 numbers split by role — neither dominates every attacking or creation line.
Style vectors overlap — DNA tags do not crown a single winner this round.
Pick
I'm backing Peersman
Preview · read-only
Peersman
Market value (€)
Floranus
Peersman
Season goals
Floranus
Peersman
Goals / 90
Floranus
Market value and efficiency metrics land in a draw band.
| Clearances / 90 |
| 3.14 |
| 3.57 |
| Per-90 comparison | Passes / 90 | 40.41 | 37.53 |
| Per-90 comparison | Tackles won / 90 | 0.73 | 1.07 |
| Per-90 comparison | Interceptions / 90 | 0.96 | 1.67 |
| DNA & style | Interceptions · league rank | Beats 35% | Top 7% |
| DNA & style | Dribbles past · league rank | Beats 42% | Beats 12% |
| DNA & style | tackles won · league rank | Beats 28% | Top 44% |
Per-90 and seasonal stats from RT data. Use the interactive PK above for all five rounds.
