Club PK
Sunderland vs Las Palmas
Pick below to start
Head-to-head player comparison · per-90 stats & DNA
Pick once · vote each round
Round 1 · Basics
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 2 · Recent form
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 3 · Per-90 comparison
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 4 · DNA & style
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 5 · Value fight
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
THE CALL: Split 53–47 — the statistics disagree across dimensions; neither player dominates every round.
Matete has the stronger profile on minutes, rating, and market cues.
Matete carries sharper recent form — season and last-10 output tilt their way.
Matete has the sharper per-90 profile in their role; Amatucci still answers in theirs.
Pick
I'm backing Matete
Preview · read-only
Matete
Season goals
Amatucci
Matete
Goals / 90
Amatucci
Style vectors overlap — DNA tags do not crown a single winner this round.
Market value and efficiency metrics land in a draw band.
| 6.99 |
| 7.01 |
| Per-90 comparison | Goals / 90 | 0.15 | 0.00 |
| Per-90 comparison | Assists / 90 | 0.05 | 0.10 |
| Per-90 comparison | Shots / 90 | 1.29 | 0.97 |
| DNA & style | Goals · league rank | Top 25% | Beats 0% |
| DNA & style | Assists · league rank | Beats 0% | Top 37% |
| DNA & style | Dribbles · league rank | Top 9% | Beats 33% |
Per-90 and seasonal stats from RT data. Use the interactive PK above for all five rounds.
