RisingTransfers

J. Timber vs William Saliba — stats comparison PK

Value PK

€70.0M vs €90.0M

J. Timber photo
Timber
VS

Pick below to start

William Saliba photo
Saliba

Arsenal centre-back pecking order · Timber’s rise vs Saliba’s peak

Pick once · vote each round

Preview · read-only

€70.0M

Timber

Market value (€)

€90.0M

Saliba

3

Timber

Season goals

1

Saliba

0.11

Timber

Goals / 90

0.03

Saliba

Round 1 · Basics

Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.

Round 2 · Recent form

Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.

Round 3 · Per-90 comparison

Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.

Round 4 · DNA & style

Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.

Round 5 · Value fight

Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.

J. Timber vs William Saliba statistical comparison

THE CALL: William Saliba edges this comparison 39–61 on RT data — a tendency, not an absolute "better player" verdict. Market value: J. Timber €70.0M vs William Saliba €90.0M.

Round 1: Basics

Saliba has the stronger profile on minutes, rating, and market cues.

  • Age: J. Timber 24 · William Saliba 25
  • Market value (€): J. Timber €70.0M · William Saliba €90.0M
  • Appearances (season): J. Timber 30 · William Saliba 31
  • Minutes played: J. Timber 2456.00 · William Saliba 2075.00
  • Avg rating: J. Timber 7.03 · William Saliba 6.92

Round 2: Recent form

Saliba carries sharper recent form — season and last-10 output tilt their way.

Last 10 matches

  • Avg rating (last 10): J. Timber 6.84 · William Saliba 7.08
  • Apps (last 10): J. Timber 10 · William Saliba 10
  • Tackles won (last 10): J. Timber 10 · William Saliba 12
  • Interceptions (last 10): J. Timber 8 · William Saliba 8
  • Clearances (last 10): J. Timber 17 · William Saliba 53

This season

  • Tackles won / 90: J. Timber 1.32 · William Saliba 0.74
  • Interceptions / 90: J. Timber 0.92 · William Saliba 0.62
  • Clearances / 90: J. Timber 1.94 · William Saliba 4.58
  • Season assists: J. Timber 5 · William Saliba 0
  • Season appearances: J. Timber 30.00 · William Saliba 31.00

Round 3: Per-90 comparison

Saliba has the sharper per-90 profile in their role; Timber still answers in theirs.

  • Passes / 90: J. Timber 39.76 · William Saliba 72.41
  • Tackles won / 90: J. Timber 1.32 · William Saliba 0.74
  • Interceptions / 90: J. Timber 0.92 · William Saliba 0.62
  • Clearances / 90: J. Timber 1.94 · William Saliba 4.58
  • Aerials won / 90: J. Timber 2.27 · William Saliba 4.58
  • Ball recovery / 90: J. Timber 3.55 · William Saliba 4.16
  • Press intensity / 90: J. Timber 2.07 · William Saliba 2.08
  • Pass accuracy %: J. Timber 85.3 · William Saliba 92.9

Round 4: DNA & style

Style vectors overlap — DNA tags do not crown a single winner this round.

  • Tackles · league rank: J. Timber Top 19% · William Saliba Beats 24%
  • clearances · league rank: J. Timber Beats 6% · William Saliba Top 42%
  • tackles won · league rank: J. Timber Top 26% · William Saliba Beats 26%
  • Aerials · league rank: J. Timber Beats 27% · William Saliba Top 26%
  • Interceptions · league rank: J. Timber Beats 39% · William Saliba Beats 11%
  • Ball recovery · league rank: J. Timber Beats 47% · William Saliba Top 37%
  • Press · league rank: J. Timber Top 49% · William Saliba Beats 41%
  • Dribbles past · league rank: J. Timber Top 16% · William Saliba Top 13%

Round 5: Value fight

Saliba looks stronger on value — fee, trend, or goal efficiency.

  • Current value (€): J. Timber €70.0M · William Saliba €90.0M
  • Peak value (€): J. Timber €70.0M · William Saliba €90.0M
  • Value trend %: J. Timber · William Saliba
  • € per season goal: J. Timber €23.3M · William Saliba €90.0M

Comparison FAQ

How do J. Timber and William Saliba compare?
THE CALL: William Saliba edges this comparison 39–61 on RT data — a tendency, not an absolute "better player" verdict. Market value: J. Timber €70.0M vs William Saliba €90.0M.
What statistics are used in this PK?
Five rounds: profile basics, recent form (last 10 matches and current season), role-aware per-90 metrics, vec_player_dna style tags, and market-value efficiency. Stats are normalised per 90 minutes where applicable.
How does Rising Transfers calculate player comparisons?
RT uses fact_player_stats_seasonal for seasonal and per-90 output, match_player_stats for recent form, vec_player_dna for style similarity, and integrated market-value history.