Club PK
Parma vs PEC Zwolle
Pick below to start
Head-to-head player comparison · per-90 stats & DNA
Pick once · vote each round
Round 1 · Basics
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 2 · Recent form
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 3 · Per-90 comparison
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 4 · DNA & style
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 5 · Value fight
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
THE CALL: Split 53–47 — the statistics disagree across dimensions; neither player dominates every round.
Strefezza has the stronger profile on minutes, rating, and market cues.
Strefezza carries sharper recent form — season and last-10 output tilt their way.
Faberski has the sharper per-90 profile in their role; Strefezza still answers in theirs.
I'm backing Strefezza
Preview · read-only
Strefezza
Market value (€)
Faberski
Strefezza
Season goals
Faberski
Strefezza
Goals / 90
Faberski
Faberski edges the DNA round on style percentiles and archetype tags.
Market value and efficiency metrics land in a draw band.
| 7.04 |
| 6.52 |
| Per-90 comparison | Goals / 90 | 0.18 | 0.00 |
| Per-90 comparison | Assists / 90 | 0.18 | 0.39 |
| Per-90 comparison | Shots / 90 | 2.13 | 2.12 |
| DNA & style | Goals · league rank | Beats 37% | Beats 0% |
| DNA & style | Assists · league rank | Top 35% | Top 6% |
| DNA & style | Big chances · league rank | Beats 47% | Top 28% |
Per-90 and seasonal stats from RT data. Use the interactive PK above for all five rounds.
