Club PK
Chelsea vs AFC Bournemouth
Pick below to start
Head-to-head player comparison · per-90 stats & DNA
Pick once · vote each round
Round 1 · Basics
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 2 · Recent form
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 3 · Per-90 comparison
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 4 · DNA & style
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 5 · Value fight
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
THE CALL: Enzo Fernández edges this comparison 57–43 on RT data — a tendency, not an absolute "better player" verdict. Market value: Enzo Fernández €90.0M vs Philip Billing €16.5M.
Fernández has the stronger profile on minutes, rating, and market cues.
Fernández carries sharper recent form — season and last-10 output tilt their way.
Fernández has the sharper per-90 profile in their role; Billing still answers in theirs.
Pick
I'm backing Fernández
Preview · read-only
Fernández
Market value (€)
Billing
Fernández
Season goals
Billing
Fernández
Goals / 90
Billing
Billing edges the DNA round on style percentiles and archetype tags.
Fernández looks stronger on value — fee, trend, or goal efficiency.
| Season rating |
| 7.25 |
| 7.14 |
| Per-90 comparison | Goals / 90 | 0.29 | 0.13 |
| Per-90 comparison | Assists / 90 | 0.12 | 0.26 |
| Per-90 comparison | Shots / 90 | 2.08 | 0.64 |
| DNA & style | Press · league rank | Beats 25% | Top 17% |
| DNA & style | Ball recovery · league rank | Beats 29% | Top 15% |
| DNA & style | Dribbles · league rank | Beats 22% | Top 28% |
Per-90 and seasonal stats from RT data. Use the interactive PK above for all five rounds.
