Club PK
AZ vs FC Utrecht
Pick below to start
Head-to-head player comparison · per-90 stats & DNA
Pick once · vote each round
Round 1 · Basics
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 2 · Recent form
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 3 · Per-90 comparison
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 4 · DNA & style
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 5 · Value fight
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
THE CALL: Split 51–49 — the statistics disagree across dimensions; neither player dominates every round.
Horemans has the stronger profile on minutes, rating, and market cues.
Horemans carries sharper recent form — season and last-10 output tilt their way.
Dijkstra has the sharper per-90 profile in their role; Horemans still answers in theirs.
Dijkstra edges the DNA round on style percentiles and archetype tags.
Pick
I'm backing Dijkstra
Preview · read-only
Dijkstra
Market value (€)
Horemans
Dijkstra
Season goals
Horemans
Dijkstra
Goals / 90
Horemans
Market value and efficiency metrics land in a draw band.
| Clearances / 90 |
| 1.92 |
| 3.37 |
| Per-90 comparison | Passes / 90 | 44.33 | 39.90 |
| Per-90 comparison | Tackles won / 90 | 1.13 | 0.91 |
| Per-90 comparison | Interceptions / 90 | 1.56 | 1.32 |
| DNA & style | Press · league rank | Top 2% | Top 44% |
| DNA & style | Ball recovery · league rank | Top 2% | Top 40% |
| DNA & style | clearances · league rank | Beats 3% | Beats 33% |
Per-90 and seasonal stats from RT data. Use the interactive PK above for all five rounds.