Club PK
FC Groningen vs NAC Breda
Pick below to start
Head-to-head player comparison · per-90 stats & DNA
Pick once · vote each round
Round 1 · Basics
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 2 · Recent form
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 3 · Per-90 comparison
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 4 · DNA & style
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 5 · Value fight
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
THE CALL: Split 50–50 — the statistics disagree across dimensions; neither player dominates every round.
Werff has the stronger profile on minutes, rating, and market cues.
Werff carries sharper recent form — season and last-10 output tilt their way.
Per-90 numbers split by role — neither dominates every attacking or creation line.
Pick
I'm backing Werff
Preview · read-only
Werff
Season goals
Janosek
Werff
Goals / 90
Janosek
Janosek edges the DNA round on style percentiles and archetype tags.
Market value and efficiency metrics land in a draw band.
| Season rating |
| 6.90 |
| 6.71 |
| Per-90 comparison | Goals / 90 | 0.13 | 0.16 |
| Per-90 comparison | Assists / 90 | 0.08 | 0.31 |
| Per-90 comparison | Shots / 90 | 2.37 | 3.25 |
| DNA & style | Ball recovery · league rank | Beats 13% | Top 21% |
| DNA & style | Press · league rank | Beats 10% | Top 39% |
| DNA & style | Tackles · league rank | Top 50% | Beats 2% |
Per-90 and seasonal stats from RT data. Use the interactive PK above for all five rounds.
