Club PK
Ulm vs Reggiana
Pick below to start
Head-to-head player comparison · per-90 stats & DNA
Pick once · vote each round
Round 1 · Basics
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 2 · Recent form
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 3 · Per-90 comparison
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 4 · DNA & style
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 5 · Value fight
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
THE CALL: Split 48–52 — the statistics disagree across dimensions; neither player dominates every round.
Chessa has the stronger profile on minutes, rating, and market cues.
Marras carries sharper recent form — season and last-10 output tilt their way.
Marras has the sharper per-90 profile in their role; Chessa still answers in theirs.
Pick
I'm backing Chessa
Preview · read-only
Chessa
Season goals
Marras
Chessa
Goals / 90
Marras
Marras edges the DNA round on style percentiles and archetype tags.
Market value and efficiency metrics land in a draw band.
| 6.79 |
| 6.96 |
| Per-90 comparison | Goals / 90 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Per-90 comparison | Assists / 90 | 0.28 | 0.36 |
| Per-90 comparison | Shots / 90 | 1.72 | 0.83 |
| DNA & style | Ball recovery · league rank | Beats 5% | Top 9% |
| DNA & style | Press · league rank | Beats 20% | Top 1% |
| DNA & style | Big chances · league rank | Top 13% | Top 47% |
Per-90 and seasonal stats from RT data. Use the interactive PK above for all five rounds.
