Club PK
Farense vs Udinese
Pick below to start
Head-to-head player comparison · per-90 stats & DNA
Pick once · vote each round
Round 1 · Basics
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 2 · Recent form
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 3 · Per-90 comparison
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 4 · DNA & style
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 5 · Value fight
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
THE CALL: Split 46–54 — the statistics disagree across dimensions; neither player dominates every round.
Buta has the stronger profile on minutes, rating, and market cues.
Recent output is balanced — form does not separate them cleanly.
Pinto has the sharper per-90 profile in their role; Buta still answers in theirs.
Buta edges the DNA round on style percentiles and archetype tags.
Pick
I'm backing Pinto
Preview · read-only
Pinto
Season goals
Buta
Pinto
Goals / 90
Buta
Market value and efficiency metrics land in a draw band.
| 3.19 |
| 1.74 |
| Per-90 comparison | Passes / 90 | 30.62 | 27.85 |
| Per-90 comparison | Tackles won / 90 | 0.53 | — |
| Per-90 comparison | Interceptions / 90 | 0.27 | 1.57 |
| DNA & style | Press · league rank | Beats 8% | Top 13% |
| DNA & style | Ball recovery · league rank | Beats 20% | Top 5% |
| DNA & style | Dribbles past · league rank | Top 19% | Beats 11% |
Per-90 and seasonal stats from RT data. Use the interactive PK above for all five rounds.
