Club PK
TOP Oss vs AZ
Pick below to start
Head-to-head player comparison · per-90 stats & DNA
Pick once · vote each round
Round 1 · Basics
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 2 · Recent form
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 3 · Per-90 comparison
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 4 · DNA & style
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 5 · Value fight
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
THE CALL: Split 49–51 — the statistics disagree across dimensions; neither player dominates every round.
Grand has the stronger profile on minutes, rating, and market cues.
Grand carries sharper recent form — season and last-10 output tilt their way.
Grand has the sharper per-90 profile in their role; Hove still answers in theirs.
Hove edges the DNA round on style percentiles and archetype tags.
I'm backing Hove
Preview · read-only
Hove
Season goals
Grand
Hove
Goals / 90
Grand
Market value and efficiency metrics land in a draw band.
| 2.16 |
| 2.57 |
| Per-90 comparison | Passes / 90 | 32.91 | 55.83 |
| Per-90 comparison | Tackles won / 90 | — | 1.24 |
| Per-90 comparison | Interceptions / 90 | 1.82 | 0.79 |
| DNA & style | Interceptions · league rank | Top 14% | Beats 13% |
| DNA & style | Dribbles past · league rank | Top 21% | Beats 15% |
| DNA & style | Press · league rank | Top 18% | Top 35% |
Per-90 and seasonal stats from RT data. Use the interactive PK above for all five rounds.
