Club PK
FC Bayern München vs Ulm
Pick below to start
Head-to-head player comparison · per-90 stats & DNA
Pick once · vote each round
Round 1 · Basics
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 2 · Recent form
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 3 · Per-90 comparison
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 4 · DNA & style
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 5 · Value fight
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
THE CALL: Split 46–54 — the statistics disagree across dimensions; neither player dominates every round.
Dressel has the stronger profile on minutes, rating, and market cues.
Recent output is balanced — form does not separate them cleanly.
Dressel has the sharper per-90 profile in their role; Pavlovic still answers in theirs.
I'm backing Pavlovic
Preview · read-only
Pavlovic
Market value (€)
Dressel
Pavlovic
Season goals
Dressel
Pavlovic
Goals / 90
Dressel
Dressel edges the DNA round on style percentiles and archetype tags.
Market value and efficiency metrics land in a draw band.
| Season rating |
| 7.11 |
| 7.09 |
| Per-90 comparison | Goals / 90 | 0.18 | 0.09 |
| Per-90 comparison | Assists / 90 | 0.06 | 0.17 |
| Per-90 comparison | Shots / 90 | 0.62 | 1.72 |
| DNA & style | Shots · league rank | Beats 14% | Top 29% |
| DNA & style | Big chances · league rank | Top 42% | Beats 12% |
| DNA & style | Tackles · league rank | Beats 46% | Top 10% |
Per-90 and seasonal stats from RT data. Use the interactive PK above for all five rounds.
