Club PK
FC Utrecht vs AZ
Pick below to start
Head-to-head player comparison · per-90 stats & DNA
Pick once · vote each round
Round 1 · Basics
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 2 · Recent form
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 3 · Per-90 comparison
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 4 · DNA & style
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 5 · Value fight
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
THE CALL: Split 49–51 — the statistics disagree across dimensions; neither player dominates every round.
Engwanda has the stronger profile on minutes, rating, and market cues.
Recent output is balanced — form does not separate them cleanly.
Twisk has the sharper per-90 profile in their role; Engwanda still answers in theirs.
Pick
I'm backing Engwanda
Preview · read-only
Engwanda
Season goals
Twisk
Engwanda
Goals / 90
Twisk
Twisk edges the DNA round on style percentiles and archetype tags.
Market value and efficiency metrics land in a draw band.
| 6.85 |
| 6.66 |
| Per-90 comparison | Goals / 90 | 0.00 | 0.08 |
| Per-90 comparison | Assists / 90 | 0.03 | 0.08 |
| Per-90 comparison | Shots / 90 | 0.27 | 0.33 |
| DNA & style | Tackles · league rank | Top 15% | Beats 24% |
| DNA & style | Goals · league rank | Beats 0% | Beats 49% |
| DNA & style | Ball recovery · league rank | Beats 28% | Top 37% |
Per-90 and seasonal stats from RT data. Use the interactive PK above for all five rounds.
