Zeki Yavru vs Mats Rots
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Zeki Yavru leads in clearances / 90 and pass accuracy %. Mats Rots is stronger in goals / 90 and tackles won / 90. Overall, Mats Rots holds the statistical edge across 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Active Full-Back. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.4 key passes/90), wins the physical battle (55% duel success), uses long balls frequently (5.8/90) and active off the ball (2.0 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.
A Active Full-Back. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.5 key passes/90), active in the tackle (2.3 tackles/90), central to possession (70 touches/90), uses long balls frequently (5.8/90) and a high-intensity presser (press score 3.1/90), constantly disrupting opposition build-up.
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Zeki Yavru | Mats Rots | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.00 | 0.10 | Mats |
| Tackles won / 90 | 1.22 | 1.65 | Mats |
| Interceptions / 90 | 1.07 | 1.17 | Mats |
| Clearances / 90 | 2.28 | 1.98 | Zeki |
| Press intensity / 90 | 2.03 | 3.12 | Mats |
| Pass accuracy % | 86.50 | 77.50 | Zeki |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Zeki Yavru or Mats Rots?
Zeki Yavru leads in clearances / 90 and pass accuracy %. Mats Rots is stronger in goals / 90 and tackles won / 90. Overall, Mats Rots holds the statistical edge across 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Zeki Yavru has a market value of N/A, while Mats Rots is valued at N/A.