Yaw Ackah vs Xander Blomme

Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season

Data Verdict

Yaw Ackah leads in shots / 90 and key passes / 90. Xander Blomme is stronger in interceptions / 90. Overall, Yaw Ackah holds the statistical edge across 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →

Player A

Yaw Ackah

Midfielder
Ghana
N/A
26 years old
Defensive
Full profile →
Player B

Xander Blomme

Midfielder
Belgium
N/A
23 years old
Defensive
Full profile →

Playing Style Profiles

Yaw Ackah

A Ball-Winner. Statistically, he stands out as an aggressive ball-winner (4.6 tackles/90), meticulous in distribution (85% pass accuracy), wins the physical battle (59% duel success), heavily involved in play (64 touches/90), a high-intensity presser (press score 3.6/90), constantly disrupting opposition build-up and top 10% tackler in the league.

Xander Blomme

Xander Blomme is a Ball-Winner. Aggressive midfielder who disrupts opponents.

Per-90 Statistics Comparison

MetricYaw AckahXander BlommeEdge
Goals / 900.000.00
Assists / 900.000.00
Shots / 900.990.54Yaw
Key passes / 900.790.13Yaw
Passes (final 3rd) / 905.35
Tackles won / 900.00
Interceptions / 901.392.02Xander
Press intensity / 903.560.71Yaw
Pass accuracy %85.2075.50Yaw

All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is the better player — Yaw Ackah or Xander Blomme?

Yaw Ackah leads in shots / 90 and key passes / 90. Xander Blomme is stronger in interceptions / 90. Overall, Yaw Ackah holds the statistical edge across 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

How is this comparison calculated?

Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →

What are their market values?

Yaw Ackah has a market value of N/A, while Xander Blomme is valued at N/A.

Explore More