Yusuf Akhamrich vs Prince Ampem
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Yusuf Akhamrich leads in goals / 90 and assists / 90. Prince Ampem is stronger in key passes / 90 and passes (final 3rd) / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Inside Forward. Statistically, he stands out as a constant goal threat (4.2 shots/90), a proven goalscorer (0.56 goals/90), a reliable supplier (0.19 assists/90) and top 10% scorer in the league.
A Inside Forward. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.3 key passes/90), a constant goal threat (2.7 shots/90), a regular goalscorer (0.28 goals/90), a dynamic dribbler (3.1/90) and draws fouls effectively (2.1/90).
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Yusuf Akhamrich | Prince Ampem | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.56 | 0.28 | Yusuf |
| Assists / 90 | 0.19 | 0.00 | Yusuf |
| Shots / 90 | 4.21 | 2.68 | Yusuf |
| Key passes / 90 | 0.65 | 1.27 | Prince |
| Passes (final 3rd) / 90 | 1.55 | 2.68 | Prince |
| Tackles won / 90 | 1.83 | 0.56 | Yusuf |
| Press intensity / 90 | 2.10 | 2.96 | Prince |
| Pass accuracy % | 75.60 | 79.40 | Prince |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Yusuf Akhamrich or Prince Ampem?
Yusuf Akhamrich leads in goals / 90 and assists / 90. Prince Ampem is stronger in key passes / 90 and passes (final 3rd) / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Yusuf Akhamrich has a market value of N/A, while Prince Ampem is valued at N/A.