RisingTransfers

Vasilije Janjicic vs Simon Bækgård

Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season

Data Verdict

Simon Bækgård is stronger in shots / 90 and key passes / 90. Overall, Simon Bækgård holds the statistical edge across 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →

Player A

Vasilije Janjicic

Midfielder
Switzerland
€900K
27 years old
Metronome
Full profile →
Player B

Simon Bækgård

Midfielder
Denmark
N/A
26 years old
Metronome
Full profile →

Playing Style Profiles

Vasilije Janjicic

A Metronome. Statistically, he stands out as meticulous in distribution (87% pass accuracy) and heavily involved in possession (64 passes/90).

Simon Bækgård

A Metronome. Statistically, he stands out as meticulous in distribution (87% pass accuracy), wins the physical battle (55% duel success), heavily involved in possession (63 passes/90), penetrates with forward passing (8.3 final-third passes/90), central to possession (78 touches/90) and uses long balls frequently (6.5/90).

Per-90 Statistics Comparison

MetricVasilije JanjicicSimon BækgårdEdge
Goals / 900.000.00
Assists / 900.000.00
Shots / 900.390.88Simon
Key passes / 900.390.79Simon
Interceptions / 901.221.32Simon
Press intensity / 900.431.93Simon
Pass accuracy %87.2088.80Simon

All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is the better player — Vasilije Janjicic or Simon Bækgård?

Simon Bækgård is stronger in shots / 90 and key passes / 90. Overall, Simon Bækgård holds the statistical edge across 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

How is this comparison calculated?

Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →

What are their market values?

Vasilije Janjicic has a market value of €900K, while Simon Bækgård is valued at N/A.

Explore More