RisingTransfers

V. Rasmussen vs Landerson

Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season

Data Verdict

V. Rasmussen leads in assists / 90 and shots / 90. Landerson is stronger in press intensity / 90 and pass accuracy %. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.

Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →

Player A

V. Rasmussen

Attacker
Denmark
N/A
24 years old
Forward
Full profile →
Player B

Landerson

Attacker
Brazil
N/A
19 years old
Forward
Full profile →

Playing Style Profiles

V. Rasmussen

A Forward. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.1 key passes/90), a reliable supplier (0.16 assists/90), meticulous in distribution (85% pass accuracy), wins the physical battle (57% duel success) and draws fouls effectively (3.5/90).

Landerson

A Forward. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.0 key passes/90), a reliable supplier (0.15 assists/90), meticulous in distribution (86% pass accuracy) and draws fouls effectively (3.0/90).

Per-90 Statistics Comparison

MetricV. RasmussenLandersonEdge
Goals / 900.000.00
Assists / 900.210.15V.
Shots / 901.761.02V.
Key passes / 901.041.02
Passes (final 3rd) / 901.38
Tackles won / 900.75
Press intensity / 901.712.61Landerson
Pass accuracy %85.1087.60Landerson

All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is the better player — V. Rasmussen or Landerson?

V. Rasmussen leads in assists / 90 and shots / 90. Landerson is stronger in press intensity / 90 and pass accuracy %. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.

How is this comparison calculated?

Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →

What are their market values?

V. Rasmussen has a market value of N/A, while Landerson is valued at N/A.

Explore More