RisingTransfers

Tomas Cvancara vs William Osula

Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season

Data Verdict

William Osula commands a higher market value (€15.0M vs €2.5M). Tomas Cvancara leads in assists / 90 and shots / 90. William Osula is stronger in goals / 90. Overall, Tomas Cvancara holds the statistical edge across 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →

Player A

Tomas Cvancara

Attacker
Czech Republic
€2.5M
25 years old
Forward
Full profile →
Player B

William Osula

Attacker
Denmark
€15.0M
22 years old
Small Sample
Full profile →

Playing Style Profiles

Tomas Cvancara

A Forward. Statistically, he stands out as a constant goal threat (2.6 shots/90) and a regular goalscorer (0.22 goals/90).

William Osula

A Forward. Note: this profile is based on 793 minutes of playing time this season.

Per-90 Statistics Comparison

MetricTomas CvancaraWilliam OsulaEdge
Goals / 900.340.68William
Assists / 900.170.00Tomas
Shots / 903.412.73Tomas
Key passes / 900.850.82
Passes (final 3rd) / 902.220.68Tomas
Tackles won / 900.340.34
Press intensity / 900.940.08Tomas
Pass accuracy %53.8045.90Tomas

All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is the better player — Tomas Cvancara or William Osula?

William Osula commands a higher market value (€15.0M vs €2.5M). Tomas Cvancara leads in assists / 90 and shots / 90. William Osula is stronger in goals / 90. Overall, Tomas Cvancara holds the statistical edge across 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

How is this comparison calculated?

Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →

What are their market values?

Tomas Cvancara has a market value of €2.5M, while William Osula is valued at €15.0M.

Explore More