RisingTransfers

Tom van der Werff vs Christoffer Palm

Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season

Data Verdict

Tom van der Werff leads in assists / 90 and interceptions / 90. Christoffer Palm is stronger in shots / 90 and key passes / 90. Overall, Christoffer Palm holds the statistical edge across 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →

Player A

Tom van der Werff

Midfielder
Netherlands
N/A
23 years old
Small Sample
Full profile →
Player B

Christoffer Palm

Midfielder
Denmark
N/A
24 years old
Small Sample
Full profile →

Playing Style Profiles

Tom van der Werff

A Balanced Midfielder. Statistically, he stands out as a prolific assist provider (0.29 assists/90) and creates high-quality scoring opportunities (0.58 big chances/90).

Christoffer Palm

A Balanced Midfielder. Statistically, he stands out as a prolific assist provider (0.32 assists/90).

Per-90 Statistics Comparison

MetricTom van der WerffChristoffer PalmEdge
Goals / 900.000.00
Assists / 900.290.00Tom
Shots / 900.442.15Christoffer
Key passes / 900.591.08Christoffer
Interceptions / 900.440.00Tom
Press intensity / 900.720.84Christoffer
Pass accuracy %50.0070.60Christoffer

All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is the better player — Tom van der Werff or Christoffer Palm?

Tom van der Werff leads in assists / 90 and interceptions / 90. Christoffer Palm is stronger in shots / 90 and key passes / 90. Overall, Christoffer Palm holds the statistical edge across 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

How is this comparison calculated?

Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →

What are their market values?

Tom van der Werff has a market value of N/A, while Christoffer Palm is valued at N/A.

Explore More