Club PK
FC Groningen vs FC Eindhoven
Pick below to start
Head-to-head player comparison · per-90 stats & DNA
Pick once · vote each round
Round 1 · Basics
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 2 · Recent form
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 3 · Per-90 comparison
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 4 · DNA & style
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 5 · Value fight
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
THE CALL: Split 51–49 — the statistics disagree across dimensions; neither player dominates every round.
Rente has the stronger profile on minutes, rating, and market cues.
Rente carries sharper recent form — season and last-10 output tilt their way.
Per-90 numbers split by role — neither dominates every attacking or creation line.
Simons edges the DNA round on style percentiles and archetype tags.
I'm backing Rente
Preview · read-only
Rente
Season goals
Simons
Rente
Goals / 90
Simons
Market value and efficiency metrics land in a draw band.
| Clearances / 90 |
| 3.73 |
| 1.95 |
| Per-90 comparison | Passes / 90 | 33.54 | 26.40 |
| Per-90 comparison | Tackles won / 90 | 1.15 | — |
| Per-90 comparison | Interceptions / 90 | 1.10 | 1.34 |
| DNA & style | Aerials · league rank | Top 8% | Beats 21% |
| DNA & style | Dribbles past · league rank | Beats 29% | Top 23% |
| DNA & style | Ball recovery · league rank | Beats 24% | Top 34% |
Per-90 and seasonal stats from RT data. Use the interactive PK above for all five rounds.
