RisingTransfers

Takuma Nishimura vs Patrick Brouwer

Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season

Data Verdict

Takuma Nishimura leads in pass accuracy %. Patrick Brouwer is stronger in assists / 90 and shots / 90. Overall, Patrick Brouwer holds the statistical edge across 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →

Player A

Takuma Nishimura

Attacker
Japan
€473K
29 years old
Complete Forward
Full profile →
Player B

Patrick Brouwer

Attacker
Netherlands
N/A
25 years old
Complete Forward
Full profile →

Playing Style Profiles

Takuma Nishimura

A Complete Forward. Statistically, he stands out as a regular goalscorer (0.29 goals/90) and a reliable supplier (0.16 assists/90).

Patrick Brouwer

A Complete Forward. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.4 key passes/90), a regular goalscorer (0.29 goals/90) and a reliable supplier (0.24 assists/90).

Per-90 Statistics Comparison

MetricTakuma NishimuraPatrick BrouwerEdge
Goals / 900.290.28
Assists / 900.160.24Patrick
Shots / 901.892.04Patrick
Key passes / 900.981.39Patrick
Passes (final 3rd) / 902.343.22Patrick
Tackles won / 900.290.97Patrick
Press intensity / 901.591.96Patrick
Pass accuracy %72.4071.70Takuma

All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is the better player — Takuma Nishimura or Patrick Brouwer?

Takuma Nishimura leads in pass accuracy %. Patrick Brouwer is stronger in assists / 90 and shots / 90. Overall, Patrick Brouwer holds the statistical edge across 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

How is this comparison calculated?

Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →

What are their market values?

Takuma Nishimura has a market value of €473K, while Patrick Brouwer is valued at N/A.

Explore More