Taşkın İlter vs Joep Kluskens
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Taşkın İlter leads in interceptions / 90 and press intensity / 90. Joep Kluskens is stronger in shots / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Ball-Winner. Statistically, he stands out as an aggressive ball-winner (2.5 tackles/90), heavily involved in play (62 touches/90), uses long balls frequently (5.3/90) and active off the ball (2.5 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.
A Ball-Winner. Statistically, he stands out as heavily involved in play (58 touches/90), uses long balls frequently (6.6/90) and active off the ball (2.1 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Taşkın İlter | Joep Kluskens | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — |
| Assists / 90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — |
| Shots / 90 | 0.63 | 1.94 | Joep |
| Key passes / 90 | 0.45 | 0.48 | — |
| Passes (final 3rd) / 90 | 7.02 | — | — |
| Tackles won / 90 | 1.50 | — | — |
| Interceptions / 90 | 1.07 | 0.97 | Taşkın |
| Press intensity / 90 | 2.46 | 2.06 | Taşkın |
| Pass accuracy % | 84.90 | — | — |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Taşkın İlter or Joep Kluskens?
Taşkın İlter leads in interceptions / 90 and press intensity / 90. Joep Kluskens is stronger in shots / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Taşkın İlter has a market value of N/A, while Joep Kluskens is valued at N/A.