Club PK
FC Eindhoven vs PEC Zwolle
Pick below to start
Head-to-head player comparison · per-90 stats & DNA
Pick once · vote each round
Round 1 · Basics
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 2 · Recent form
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 3 · Per-90 comparison
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 4 · DNA & style
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 5 · Value fight
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
THE CALL: Tom de Graaff edges this comparison 43–57 on RT data — a tendency, not an absolute "better player" verdict.
Graaff has the stronger profile on minutes, rating, and market cues.
Graaff carries sharper recent form — season and last-10 output tilt their way.
Graaff has the sharper per-90 profile in their role; Borgmans still answers in theirs.
Style vectors overlap — DNA tags do not crown a single winner this round.
I'm backing Borgmans
Preview · read-only
Borgmans
Season goals
Graaff
Borgmans
Goals / 90
Graaff
Market value and efficiency metrics land in a draw band.
| Saves / 90 |
| 3.64 |
| 4.13 |
| Per-90 comparison | Passes / 90 | 37.71 | 32.61 |
| Per-90 comparison | Pass accuracy % | 54.6 | 55.1 |
| Per-90 comparison | Saves / 90 | 3.64 | 4.13 |
| DNA & style | Saves · league rank | Top 48% | Top 19% |
| DNA & style | clearances · league rank | Top 33% | Beats 39% |
| DNA & style | goals conceded · league rank | Beats 0% | Beats 16% |
Per-90 and seasonal stats from RT data. Use the interactive PK above for all five rounds.
