Sofus Johannesen vs Mitchell van Rooijen
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Sofus Johannesen leads in shots / 90 and key passes / 90. Mitchell van Rooijen is stronger in goals / 90 and interceptions / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Ball-Winner. Statistically, he stands out as a constant goal threat (2.8 shots/90), a regular goalscorer (0.38 goals/90), a reliable supplier (0.15 assists/90), a dynamic dribbler (2.2/90), heavily involved in play (52 touches/90), draws fouls effectively (3.2/90) and active off the ball (2.5 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.
A Balanced Midfielder. Statistically, he stands out as active off the ball (2.3 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Sofus Johannesen | Mitchell van Rooijen | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.00 | 0.18 | Mitchell |
| Assists / 90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — |
| Shots / 90 | 2.15 | 1.18 | Sofus |
| Key passes / 90 | 0.43 | 0.20 | Sofus |
| Interceptions / 90 | 0.86 | 1.18 | Mitchell |
| Press intensity / 90 | 2.51 | 2.32 | Sofus |
| Pass accuracy % | 70.10 | 76.60 | Mitchell |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Sofus Johannesen or Mitchell van Rooijen?
Sofus Johannesen leads in shots / 90 and key passes / 90. Mitchell van Rooijen is stronger in goals / 90 and interceptions / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Sofus Johannesen has a market value of N/A, while Mitchell van Rooijen is valued at N/A.