Simon Bækgård vs Mark Brink
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Simon Bækgård leads in shots / 90 and key passes / 90. Mark Brink is stronger in press intensity / 90 and pass accuracy %. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Metronome. Statistically, he stands out as meticulous in distribution (87% pass accuracy), wins the physical battle (55% duel success), heavily involved in possession (63 passes/90), penetrates with forward passing (8.3 final-third passes/90), central to possession (78 touches/90) and uses long balls frequently (6.5/90).
A Metronome. Statistically, he stands out as meticulous in distribution (91% pass accuracy), heavily involved in possession (72 passes/90), central to possession (81 touches/90) and active off the ball (2.4 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Simon Bækgård | Mark Brink | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — |
| Assists / 90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — |
| Shots / 90 | 0.88 | 0.13 | Simon |
| Key passes / 90 | 0.79 | 0.40 | Simon |
| Interceptions / 90 | 1.32 | 0.40 | Simon |
| Press intensity / 90 | 1.93 | 2.36 | Mark |
| Pass accuracy % | 88.80 | 90.50 | Mark |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Simon Bækgård or Mark Brink?
Simon Bækgård leads in shots / 90 and key passes / 90. Mark Brink is stronger in press intensity / 90 and pass accuracy %. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Simon Bækgård has a market value of N/A, while Mark Brink is valued at N/A.