RisingTransfers

Sergey Politevich vs H. Bonnesen

Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season

Data Verdict

Sergey Politevich leads in interceptions / 90 and clearances / 90. H. Bonnesen is stronger in goals / 90 and press intensity / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.

Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →

Player A

Sergey Politevich

Defender
Belarus
N/A
36 years old
Aerial
Full profile →
Player B

H. Bonnesen

Defender
Denmark
N/A
25 years old
Aerial
Full profile →

Playing Style Profiles

Sergey Politevich

A Physical Stopper. Statistically, he stands out as commanding in the air (5.8 clearances/90), reads the game exceptionally (2.0 interceptions/90) and wins the physical battle (61% duel success).

H. Bonnesen

A Physical Stopper. Statistically, he stands out as commanding in the air (5.3 clearances/90), reads the game exceptionally (1.5 interceptions/90), wins the physical battle (61% duel success) and uses long balls frequently (6.2/90).

Per-90 Statistics Comparison

MetricSergey PolitevichH. BonnesenEdge
Goals / 900.000.09H.
Interceptions / 902.041.56Sergey
Clearances / 906.004.71Sergey
Press intensity / 900.701.37H.
Pass accuracy %75.9089.00H.

All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is the better player — Sergey Politevich or H. Bonnesen?

Sergey Politevich leads in interceptions / 90 and clearances / 90. H. Bonnesen is stronger in goals / 90 and press intensity / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.

How is this comparison calculated?

Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →

What are their market values?

Sergey Politevich has a market value of N/A, while H. Bonnesen is valued at N/A.

Explore More