S. van Doorm vs Gino Fechner
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
S. van Doorm leads in goals / 90 and shots / 90. Gino Fechner is stronger in assists / 90. Overall, S. van Doorm holds the statistical edge across 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Box-to-Box. Statistically, he stands out as active in the tackle (2.2 tackles/90) and reads the game exceptionally (1.5 interceptions/90).
A Box-to-Box. Statistically, he stands out as active in the tackle (2.4 tackles/90) and wins the physical battle (56% duel success).
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | S. van Doorm | Gino Fechner | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.06 | 0.00 | S. |
| Assists / 90 | 0.00 | 0.11 | Gino |
| Shots / 90 | 0.45 | 0.33 | S. |
| Key passes / 90 | 0.90 | 0.49 | S. |
| Interceptions / 90 | 1.88 | 1.40 | S. |
| Press intensity / 90 | 0.53 | 0.40 | S. |
| Pass accuracy % | 82.80 | 81.10 | S. |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — S. van Doorm or Gino Fechner?
S. van Doorm leads in goals / 90 and shots / 90. Gino Fechner is stronger in assists / 90. Overall, S. van Doorm holds the statistical edge across 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
S. van Doorm has a market value of N/A, while Gino Fechner is valued at N/A.