Club PK
FC Utrecht vs Sparta Rotterdam
Pick below to start
Head-to-head player comparison · per-90 stats & DNA
Pick once · vote each round
Round 1 · Basics
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 2 · Recent form
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 3 · Per-90 comparison
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 4 · DNA & style
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 5 · Value fight
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
THE CALL: Split 53–47 — the statistics disagree across dimensions; neither player dominates every round.
Horemans has the stronger profile on minutes, rating, and market cues.
Sambo carries sharper recent form — season and last-10 output tilt their way.
Per-90 numbers split by role — neither dominates every attacking or creation line.
Style vectors overlap — DNA tags do not crown a single winner this round.
Pick
I'm backing Horemans
Preview · read-only
Horemans
Season goals
Sambo
Horemans
Goals / 90
Sambo
Market value and efficiency metrics land in a draw band.
| Clearances / 90 |
| 3.37 |
| 4.49 |
| Per-90 comparison | Passes / 90 | 39.90 | 37.22 |
| Per-90 comparison | Tackles won / 90 | 0.91 | 1.47 |
| Per-90 comparison | Interceptions / 90 | 1.32 | 1.05 |
| DNA & style | tackles won · league rank | Beats 36% | Top 26% |
| DNA & style | Aerials · league rank | Beats 26% | Top 40% |
| DNA & style | Interceptions · league rank | Top 28% | Beats 46% |
Per-90 and seasonal stats from RT data. Use the interactive PK above for all five rounds.
