Stephan Ambrosius vs Giovanni van Zwam
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Stephan Ambrosius leads in interceptions / 90 and clearances / 90. Giovanni van Zwam is stronger in pass accuracy %. Overall, Stephan Ambrosius holds the statistical edge across 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as active in the tackle (1.9 tackles/90), commanding in the air (5.0 clearances/90), wins the physical battle (61% duel success), uses long balls frequently (6.3/90) and active off the ball (2.0 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.
A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as commanding in the air (5.7 clearances/90), blocks shots courageously (1.6 blocks/90) and uses long balls frequently (6.9/90).
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Stephan Ambrosius | Giovanni van Zwam | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — |
| Tackles won / 90 | — | 0.45 | — |
| Interceptions / 90 | 1.48 | 0.73 | Stephan |
| Clearances / 90 | 8.36 | 5.69 | Stephan |
| Press intensity / 90 | 2.00 | 1.01 | Stephan |
| Pass accuracy % | 84.00 | 85.00 | Giovanni |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Stephan Ambrosius or Giovanni van Zwam?
Stephan Ambrosius leads in interceptions / 90 and clearances / 90. Giovanni van Zwam is stronger in pass accuracy %. Overall, Stephan Ambrosius holds the statistical edge across 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Stephan Ambrosius has a market value of N/A, while Giovanni van Zwam is valued at N/A.