Club PK
Crystal Palace vs FC Tokyo
Pick below to start
Head-to-head player comparison · per-90 stats & DNA
Pick once · vote each round
Round 1 · Basics
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 2 · Recent form
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 3 · Per-90 comparison
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 4 · DNA & style
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 5 · Value fight
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
THE CALL: Split 50–50 — the statistics disagree across dimensions; neither player dominates every round.
Profiles are close on minutes and market value — no clear profile edge.
Recent output is balanced — form does not separate them cleanly.
Kim has the sharper per-90 profile in their role; Goodman still answers in theirs.
Goodman edges the DNA round on style percentiles and archetype tags.
Pick
I'm backing Goodman
Preview · read-only
Goodman
Market value (€)
Kim
Goodman
Season goals
Kim
Goodman
Goals / 90
Kim
Market value and efficiency metrics land in a draw band.
| 2.64 |
| 2.36 |
| Per-90 comparison | Passes / 90 | 32.00 | 38.86 |
| Per-90 comparison | Pass accuracy % | 43.7 | 68.4 |
| Per-90 comparison | Saves / 90 | 2.64 | 2.36 |
| DNA & style | Ball recovery · league rank | Top 10% | Beats 47% |
| DNA & style | goals conceded · league rank | Beats 37% | Top 34% |
| DNA & style | Saves · league rank | Top 39% | Beats 37% |
Per-90 and seasonal stats from RT data. Use the interactive PK above for all five rounds.
