Seifeddine Jaziri vs Elye Wahi
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Elye Wahi commands a higher market value (€12.0M vs €650K). Seifeddine Jaziri leads in shots / 90 and key passes / 90. Elye Wahi is stronger in assists / 90 and press intensity / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
Seifeddine Jaziri is a Poacher. Clinical finisher who lives for goals inside the box.
A Complete Forward. Statistically, he stands out as a constant goal threat (2.7 shots/90), a proven goalscorer (0.47 goals/90), a reliable supplier (0.16 assists/90) and creates high-quality scoring opportunities (0.78 big chances/90).
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Seifeddine Jaziri | Elye Wahi | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — |
| Assists / 90 | 0.00 | 0.28 | Elye |
| Shots / 90 | 3.24 | 1.97 | Seifeddine |
| Key passes / 90 | 1.22 | 1.13 | Seifeddine |
| Passes (final 3rd) / 90 | — | 1.20 | — |
| Tackles won / 90 | — | 0.00 | — |
| Press intensity / 90 | 0.07 | 0.18 | Elye |
| Pass accuracy % | 80.00 | 72.20 | Seifeddine |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Seifeddine Jaziri or Elye Wahi?
Elye Wahi commands a higher market value (€12.0M vs €650K). Seifeddine Jaziri leads in shots / 90 and key passes / 90. Elye Wahi is stronger in assists / 90 and press intensity / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Seifeddine Jaziri has a market value of €650K, while Elye Wahi is valued at €12.0M.