RisingTransfers

Santiago Eneme vs Benjamin Zjajo

Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season

Data Verdict

Santiago Eneme leads in shots / 90 and key passes / 90. Benjamin Zjajo is stronger in interceptions / 90 and press intensity / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.

Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →

Player A

Santiago Eneme

Midfielder
Equatorial Guinea
€2.0M
25 years old
Creative
Full profile →
Player B

Benjamin Zjajo

Midfielder
Denmark
N/A
25 years old
Creative
Full profile →

Playing Style Profiles

Santiago Eneme

A Creator. Statistically, he stands out as an elite creator (2.1 key passes/90), meticulous in distribution (88% pass accuracy), heavily involved in play (69 touches/90) and top 20% creator in the league.

Benjamin Zjajo

A Creator. Statistically, he stands out as an elite creator (1.9 key passes/90), a reliable supplier (0.17 assists/90) and top 10% creator in the league.

Per-90 Statistics Comparison

MetricSantiago EnemeBenjamin ZjajoEdge
Goals / 900.000.00
Assists / 900.000.00
Shots / 902.401.28Santiago
Key passes / 902.400.85Santiago
Interceptions / 900.341.49Benjamin
Press intensity / 901.861.95Benjamin
Pass accuracy %75.20

All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is the better player — Santiago Eneme or Benjamin Zjajo?

Santiago Eneme leads in shots / 90 and key passes / 90. Benjamin Zjajo is stronger in interceptions / 90 and press intensity / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.

How is this comparison calculated?

Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →

What are their market values?

Santiago Eneme has a market value of €2.0M, while Benjamin Zjajo is valued at N/A.

Explore More