Siriki Dembélé vs Amad Diallo
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Amad Diallo commands a higher market value (€50.0M vs €2.6M). Siriki Dembélé leads in assists / 90 and press intensity / 90. Amad Diallo is stronger in goals / 90 and shots / 90. Overall, Amad Diallo holds the statistical edge across 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Dynamic Forward. Statistically, he stands out as an elite creator (1.6 key passes/90), a dynamic dribbler (2.9/90) and draws fouls effectively (3.0/90).
A Complete Forward. Statistically, he stands out as naturally left-footed, an elite creator (1.7 key passes/90) and meticulous in distribution (88% pass accuracy).
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Siriki Dembélé | Amad Diallo | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.00 | 0.08 | Amad |
| Assists / 90 | 0.14 | 0.08 | Siriki |
| Shots / 90 | 0.96 | 2.04 | Amad |
| Key passes / 90 | 1.65 | 1.66 | — |
| Passes (final 3rd) / 90 | 1.51 | 2.41 | Amad |
| Tackles won / 90 | 0.96 | 0.93 | — |
| Press intensity / 90 | 3.34 | 2.15 | Siriki |
| Pass accuracy % | 80.30 | 88.00 | Amad |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Siriki Dembélé or Amad Diallo?
Amad Diallo commands a higher market value (€50.0M vs €2.6M). Siriki Dembélé leads in assists / 90 and press intensity / 90. Amad Diallo is stronger in goals / 90 and shots / 90. Overall, Amad Diallo holds the statistical edge across 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Siriki Dembélé has a market value of €2.6M, while Amad Diallo is valued at €50.0M.