RisingTransfers

Ángel Recio vs Lukas Kirkegaard

Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season

Data Verdict

Lukas Kirkegaard is stronger in goals / 90 and interceptions / 90. Overall, Lukas Kirkegaard holds the statistical edge across 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →

Player A

Ángel Recio

Defender
Spain
N/A
23 years old
Ball-Playing CB
Full profile →
Player B

Lukas Kirkegaard

Defender
Denmark
N/A
20 years old
Ball-Playing
Full profile →

Playing Style Profiles

Ángel Recio

A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as commanding in the air (4.1 clearances/90), heavily involved in possession (62 passes/90), central to possession (72 touches/90) and uses long balls frequently (8.4/90).

Lukas Kirkegaard

A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as commanding in the air (4.8 clearances/90), meticulous in distribution (86% pass accuracy), wins the physical battle (64% duel success), penetrates with forward passing (8.9 final-third passes/90) and uses long balls frequently (8.4/90).

Per-90 Statistics Comparison

MetricÁngel RecioLukas KirkegaardEdge
Goals / 900.000.08Lukas
Interceptions / 900.670.80Lukas
Clearances / 903.674.59Lukas
Press intensity / 901.771.82Lukas
Pass accuracy %62.5085.50Lukas

All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is the better player — Ángel Recio or Lukas Kirkegaard?

Lukas Kirkegaard is stronger in goals / 90 and interceptions / 90. Overall, Lukas Kirkegaard holds the statistical edge across 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

How is this comparison calculated?

Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →

What are their market values?

Ángel Recio has a market value of N/A, while Lukas Kirkegaard is valued at N/A.

Explore More